[Auditory speech-evoked cerebral cortex potentials in patients with stuttering syndromes]. 1998

F Rosanowski, and U Hoppe, and T Hies, and M Moser, and U Pröschel, and U Eysholdt
Abteilung für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie, Klinikum der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg.

BACKGROUND The cause of stuttering is unknown. For clinical purposes it proved to be useful to assume a multifactorial genesis with organic psychological and social aspects. A longstanding organic theory focussed on the failure to develop left-hemispheric dominance for speech, whereas others favoured deficits of the speech motor system. Positron emission tomography (PET) studies support organic theories for the development of stuttering. The purpose of this study was to find out whether in stutterers auditory cortical potentials evoked by pure tones, noise and words are different to those of healthy controls. METHODS 10 young adults having suffered from stuttering since infancy were examined. The potentials were measured and analysed as previously described. RESULTS No correlation of clinical and electrophysiological findings were found. In one case the evoked potentials were normal, in all other patients heterogeneous results were obtained in respect of tone-evoked and both noise- and speech-evoked potentials. Cortical hemispheric differences could be detected. CONCLUSIONS In agreement with PET findings reported in the literature the data obtained in this study indicate an organic, central nervous cause of stuttering. Obviously both speech motoric components and perception elements are affected. These facts have to be taken into account whenever a psychological cause of stuttering is suspected. Nevertheless, psychosomatic aspects of the disturbances must be considered since they influence the patients' ability to cope with their symptom.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D012016 Reference Values The range or frequency distribution of a measurement in a population (of organisms, organs or things) that has not been selected for the presence of disease or abnormality. Normal Range,Normal Values,Reference Ranges,Normal Ranges,Normal Value,Range, Normal,Range, Reference,Ranges, Normal,Ranges, Reference,Reference Range,Reference Value,Value, Normal,Value, Reference,Values, Normal,Values, Reference
D001931 Brain Mapping Imaging techniques used to colocalize sites of brain functions or physiological activity with brain structures. Brain Electrical Activity Mapping,Functional Cerebral Localization,Topographic Brain Mapping,Brain Mapping, Topographic,Functional Cerebral Localizations,Mapping, Brain,Mapping, Topographic Brain
D004292 Dominance, Cerebral Dominance of one cerebral hemisphere over the other in cerebral functions. Cerebral Dominance,Hemispheric Specialization,Dominances, Cerebral,Specialization, Hemispheric
D005072 Evoked Potentials, Auditory The electric response evoked in the CEREBRAL CORTEX by ACOUSTIC STIMULATION or stimulation of the AUDITORY PATHWAYS. Auditory Evoked Potentials,Auditory Evoked Response,Auditory Evoked Potential,Auditory Evoked Responses,Evoked Potential, Auditory,Evoked Response, Auditory,Evoked Responses, Auditory,Potentials, Auditory Evoked
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000293 Adolescent A person 13 to 18 years of age. Adolescence,Youth,Adolescents,Adolescents, Female,Adolescents, Male,Teenagers,Teens,Adolescent, Female,Adolescent, Male,Female Adolescent,Female Adolescents,Male Adolescent,Male Adolescents,Teen,Teenager,Youths
D000328 Adult A person having attained full growth or maturity. Adults are of 19 through 44 years of age. For a person between 19 and 24 years of age, YOUNG ADULT is available. Adults
D001300 Audiometry, Evoked Response A form of electrophysiologic audiometry in which an analog computer is included in the circuit to average out ongoing or spontaneous brain wave activity. A characteristic pattern of response to a sound stimulus may then become evident. Evoked response audiometry is known also as electric response audiometry. Audiometry, Electroencephalic Response,Electrocochleography,Evoked Response Audiometry,Audiometries, Electroencephalic Response,Audiometries, Evoked Response,Electrocochleographies,Electroencephalic Response Audiometries,Electroencephalic Response Audiometry,Evoked Response Audiometries,Response Audiometries, Electroencephalic,Response Audiometries, Evoked,Response Audiometry, Electroencephalic,Response Audiometry, Evoked

Related Publications

F Rosanowski, and U Hoppe, and T Hies, and M Moser, and U Pröschel, and U Eysholdt
January 2014, Scientifica,
F Rosanowski, and U Hoppe, and T Hies, and M Moser, and U Pröschel, and U Eysholdt
September 1971, Science (New York, N.Y.),
F Rosanowski, and U Hoppe, and T Hies, and M Moser, and U Pröschel, and U Eysholdt
January 2020, Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology,
F Rosanowski, and U Hoppe, and T Hies, and M Moser, and U Pröschel, and U Eysholdt
April 1989, Acta neurologica Scandinavica,
F Rosanowski, and U Hoppe, and T Hies, and M Moser, and U Pröschel, and U Eysholdt
December 1986, Neuroscience letters,
F Rosanowski, and U Hoppe, and T Hies, and M Moser, and U Pröschel, and U Eysholdt
January 2009, Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology,
F Rosanowski, and U Hoppe, and T Hies, and M Moser, and U Pröschel, and U Eysholdt
December 1963, Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria,
F Rosanowski, and U Hoppe, and T Hies, and M Moser, and U Pröschel, and U Eysholdt
January 2022, CoDAS,
F Rosanowski, and U Hoppe, and T Hies, and M Moser, and U Pröschel, and U Eysholdt
February 1998, Doklady Akademii nauk,
F Rosanowski, and U Hoppe, and T Hies, and M Moser, and U Pröschel, and U Eysholdt
February 1960, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!