Amniotic fluid lamellar body count: cost-effective screening for fetal lung maturity. 1999

P S Lewis, and M R Lauria, and J Dzieczkowski, and G O Utter, and M P Dombrowski
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, Hutzel Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA. plewis@med.wayne.edu

OBJECTIVE To create a highly specific cascade testing scheme for fetal lung maturity using the lamellar body count, lecithin/sphingomyelin ratio (L/S), and phosphatidylglycerol. METHODS A nondedicated hematology analyzer (Sysmex NE 1500, Toa Medical Electronics, Los Angeles, CA) was used to determine the lamellar body counts of 209 unspun amniotic fluid specimens. Maximally specific lamellar body count cutoffs for biochemical maturity and immaturity were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Biochemical lung maturity was defined as either a mature L/S ratio or phosphatidylglycerol. Biochemical lung immaturity was defined as both an immature L/S ratio and an immature phosphatidylglycerol. RESULTS A lamellar body count of less than 8000 (n = 17) was 100% specific for biochemical lung immaturity (positive predictive value = 100%, negative predictive value = 86%). A lamellar body count of greater than 32,000 was 98% specific for biochemical lung maturity (positive predictive value = 99%, negative predictive value = 63%). CONCLUSIONS Testing only specimens where the lamellar body count was greater than 8000 and less than or equal to 32,000 for the L/S ratio and phosphatidylglycerol would preclude the need for 76% of all L/S and phosphatidylglycerol assays. Because the lamellar body count is quick, simple, and universally available, it could serve as an extremely cost-effective screening test for fetal lung maturity.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008168 Lung Either of the pair of organs occupying the cavity of the thorax that effect the aeration of the blood. Lungs
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D005325 Fetal Organ Maturity Functional competence of specific organs or body systems of the FETUS in utero. Fetal Maturity, Functional,Functional Fetal Maturity,Maturity, Fetal Organ,Maturity, Functional Fetal,Organ Maturity, Fetal
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000653 Amniotic Fluid A clear, yellowish liquid that envelopes the FETUS inside the sac of AMNION. In the first trimester, it is likely a transudate of maternal or fetal plasma. In the second trimester, amniotic fluid derives primarily from fetal lung and kidney. Cells or substances in this fluid can be removed for prenatal diagnostic tests (AMNIOCENTESIS). Amniotic Fluid Index,Amniotic Fluid Indices,Amniotic Fluids,Fluid Index, Amniotic,Fluid Indices, Amniotic,Fluid, Amniotic,Fluids, Amniotic,Index, Amniotic Fluid,Indices, Amniotic Fluid
D012680 Sensitivity and Specificity Binary classification measures to assess test results. Sensitivity or recall rate is the proportion of true positives. Specificity is the probability of correctly determining the absence of a condition. (From Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) Specificity,Sensitivity,Specificity and Sensitivity

Related Publications

P S Lewis, and M R Lauria, and J Dzieczkowski, and G O Utter, and M P Dombrowski
September 1999, Obstetrics and gynecology,
P S Lewis, and M R Lauria, and J Dzieczkowski, and G O Utter, and M P Dombrowski
January 2010, Medicinski pregled,
P S Lewis, and M R Lauria, and J Dzieczkowski, and G O Utter, and M P Dombrowski
January 1996, Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association,
P S Lewis, and M R Lauria, and J Dzieczkowski, and G O Utter, and M P Dombrowski
August 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology,
P S Lewis, and M R Lauria, and J Dzieczkowski, and G O Utter, and M P Dombrowski
January 2015, The Journal of reproductive medicine,
P S Lewis, and M R Lauria, and J Dzieczkowski, and G O Utter, and M P Dombrowski
May 2017, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics,
P S Lewis, and M R Lauria, and J Dzieczkowski, and G O Utter, and M P Dombrowski
January 2012, Medicinski arhiv,
P S Lewis, and M R Lauria, and J Dzieczkowski, and G O Utter, and M P Dombrowski
January 1999, Archives of gynecology and obstetrics,
P S Lewis, and M R Lauria, and J Dzieczkowski, and G O Utter, and M P Dombrowski
April 2005, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,
P S Lewis, and M R Lauria, and J Dzieczkowski, and G O Utter, and M P Dombrowski
January 2005, Journal of perinatal medicine,
Copied contents to your clipboard!