The diagnosis and assessment of mitral regurgitation has been one of the main challenges for cardiac ultrasound. Imaging techniques (M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography) provide direct morphologic and etiologic information of the evaluation of patients with suspected mitral regurgitation. The advent of cardiac Doppler increased tremendously the ability to evaluate mitral regurgitation noninvasively. Continuous-wave and pulsed Doppler have been found to be sensitive and specific in the detection of mitral regurgitation. The introduction of color flow Doppler simplified enormously the assessment of patients with suspected mitral regurgitation. The maximal regurgitant area and maximal regurgitant area corrected for left atrial size have become the most commonly used parameters to evaluate mitral regurgitation by color flow Doppler in the clinical setting. However, the color regurgitant jet area is highly dependent on anatomical, hemodynamic, and equipment factors. A new method, based on the proximal isovelocity surface area, is being evaluated and appears to be relatively independent of equipment factors. Transesophageal echocardiography has been shown to be exquisitely sensitive in the detection of mitral regurgitation. Quantitation of mitral regurgitation by transesophageal echocardiography is currently based on the maximal regurgitant area and this parameter appears to correlate closely with the angiographic degree of mitral regurgitation. Pulmonary venous flow analysis had been used in conjunction with color flow mapping for the evaluation of mitral regurgitation by transesophageal echocardiography. The presence of reversed systolic flow has been shown to be sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of severe mitral regurgitation. Patients with clinically difficult surface studies, flail mitral valve leaflets, and prosthetic mitral valve are best evaluated by the transesophageal approach with interrogation of pulmonary venous flow.