Quality assurance in mammography: artifact analysis. 1999

J P Hogge, and C H Palmer, and C C Muller, and S T Little, and D C Smith, and P P Fatouros, and E S de Paredes
Department of Radiology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298, USA.

Evaluation of mammograms for artifacts is essential for mammographic quality assurance. A variety of mammographic artifacts (i.e., variations in mammographic density not caused by true attenuation differences) can occur and can create pseudolesions or mask true abnormalities. Many artifacts are readily identified, whereas others present a true diagnostic challenge. Factors that create artifacts may be related to the processor (eg, static, dirt or excessive developer buildup on the rollers, excessive roller pressure, damp film, scrapes and scratches, incomplete fixing, power failure, contaminated developer), the technologist (eg, improper film handling and loading, improper use of the mammography unit and related equipment, positioning and darkroom errors), the mammography unit (eg, failure of the collimation mirror to rotate, grid inhomogeneity, failure of the reciprocating grid to move, material in the tube housing, compression failure, improper alignment of the compression paddle with the Bucky tray, defective compression paddle), or the patient (e.g., motion, superimposed objects or substances [jewelry, body parts, clothing, hair, implanted medical devices, foreign bodies, substances on the skin]). Familiarity with the broad range of artifacts and the measures required to eliminate them is vital. Careful attention to darkroom cleanliness, care in film handling, regularly scheduled processor maintenance and chemical replenishment, daily quality assurance activities, and careful attention to detail during patient positioning and mammography can reduce or eliminate most mammographic artifacts.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008327 Mammography Radiographic examination of the breast. 3D-Mammography,Digital Breast Tomosynthesis,Digital Mammography,X-ray Breast Tomosynthesis,3D Mammography,3D-Mammographies,Breast Tomosyntheses, Digital,Breast Tomosyntheses, X-ray,Breast Tomosynthesis, Digital,Breast Tomosynthesis, X-ray,Digital Breast Tomosyntheses,Digital Mammographies,Mammographies,Mammographies, Digital,Mammography, Digital,X ray Breast Tomosynthesis,X-ray Breast Tomosyntheses
D011785 Quality Assurance, Health Care Activities and programs intended to assure or improve the quality of care in either a defined medical setting or a program. The concept includes the assessment or evaluation of the quality of care; identification of problems or shortcomings in the delivery of care; designing activities to overcome these deficiencies; and follow-up monitoring to ensure effectiveness of corrective steps. Quality Assessment, Health Care,Health Care Quality Assessment,Health Care Quality Assurance,Healthcare Quality Assessment,Healthcare Quality Assurance,Quality Assessment, Healthcare,Quality Assurance, Healthcare,Assessment, Healthcare Quality,Assessments, Healthcare Quality,Assurance, Healthcare Quality,Assurances, Healthcare Quality,Healthcare Quality Assessments,Healthcare Quality Assurances,Quality Assessments, Healthcare,Quality Assurances, Healthcare
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D016477 Artifacts Any visible result of a procedure which is caused by the procedure itself and not by the entity being analyzed. Common examples include histological structures introduced by tissue processing, radiographic images of structures that are not naturally present in living tissue, and products of chemical reactions that occur during analysis. Artefacts,Artefact,Artifact

Related Publications

J P Hogge, and C H Palmer, and C C Muller, and S T Little, and D C Smith, and P P Fatouros, and E S de Paredes
April 1996, Minnesota medicine,
J P Hogge, and C H Palmer, and C C Muller, and S T Little, and D C Smith, and P P Fatouros, and E S de Paredes
December 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
J P Hogge, and C H Palmer, and C C Muller, and S T Little, and D C Smith, and P P Fatouros, and E S de Paredes
January 1992, Journal of the American Medical Women's Association (1972),
J P Hogge, and C H Palmer, and C C Muller, and S T Little, and D C Smith, and P P Fatouros, and E S de Paredes
December 1989, Cancer,
J P Hogge, and C H Palmer, and C C Muller, and S T Little, and D C Smith, and P P Fatouros, and E S de Paredes
July 1994, Cancer,
J P Hogge, and C H Palmer, and C C Muller, and S T Little, and D C Smith, and P P Fatouros, and E S de Paredes
January 2002, Radiologic technology,
J P Hogge, and C H Palmer, and C C Muller, and S T Little, and D C Smith, and P P Fatouros, and E S de Paredes
January 1990, Health devices,
J P Hogge, and C H Palmer, and C C Muller, and S T Little, and D C Smith, and P P Fatouros, and E S de Paredes
December 1991, Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine,
J P Hogge, and C H Palmer, and C C Muller, and S T Little, and D C Smith, and P P Fatouros, and E S de Paredes
July 1989, Cancer,
J P Hogge, and C H Palmer, and C C Muller, and S T Little, and D C Smith, and P P Fatouros, and E S de Paredes
August 1993, Cancer,
Copied contents to your clipboard!