Blinded evaluation of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction prostate-specific antigen peripheral blood assay for molecular staging of prostate cancer. 1999

C L Gao, and S Maheshwari, and R C Dean, and L Tatum, and R Mooneyhan, and R R Connelly, and D G McLeod, and S Srivastava, and J W Moul
Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-4799, USA.

OBJECTIVE The reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay to detect presumed occult micrometastatic prostate cancer has been controversial, and this molecular staging has been thought to be clinically useful by some groups but not others. METHODS We used a sensitive nested RT-PCR assay with specific primers derived from the PSA sequence and a very stringent two-step PCR protocol with denaturing temperature of 94 degrees C annealing and extension temperature of 68 degrees C. This method enabled us to detect PSA-expressing LNCaP prostate cancer (PC) cells as low as one cell of 10 million lymphocytes (1/10(7)). Ninety-six patients with PC were studied, including 85 before radical prostatectomy (RP), and 22 controls, including healthy men and women and men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. RESULTS In 85 patients undergoing RP, a minimum of two independent RT-PCR-PSA assays detected circulating prostate cells preoperatively in 27 patients (31.8%). Of 12 patients with locally advanced or advanced stage cancer, RT-PCR-PSA was positive in 5 (41.7%); of the 22 controls, no patient was RT-PCR-PSA positive. In 10 randomly selected cases, the RT-PCR product was confirmed as PSA by DNA sequencing. Of the 27 patients undergoing RP who were RT-PCR positive, 11 (40.7%) had non-organ-confined disease (pT3a or greater), and of the 58 patients who were RT-PCR negative, 32 (55.2%) had non-organ-confined disease. Patients with RT-PCR positive results also had lower margin positivity (9 of 27, 33.3%) than did patients with RT-PCR negative results (21 of 58, 36.2%). Finally, at a mean follow-up of 25.7 months, 5 (18.5%) of 27 RT-PCR positive patients had recurrence (PSA) compared with 14 (24.1%) of 58 RT-PCR negative patients. CONCLUSIONS On the basis of this blinded study, RT-PCR for PSA-expressing cells in 85 patients before RP is not related to clinical stage, age, race, grade, Gleason sum, serum PSA or prostatic acid phosphatase, tumor volume, or tumor multifocality. RT-PCR positivity did not predict pathologic stage or early PSA recurrence. A standardized RT-PCR assay needs to be developed to account for interlaboratory discrepancies.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D009364 Neoplasm Recurrence, Local The local recurrence of a neoplasm following treatment. It arises from microscopic cells of the original neoplasm that have escaped therapeutic intervention and later become clinically visible at the original site. Local Neoplasm Recurrence,Local Neoplasm Recurrences,Locoregional Neoplasm Recurrence,Neoplasm Recurrence, Locoregional,Neoplasm Recurrences, Local,Recurrence, Local Neoplasm,Recurrence, Locoregional Neoplasm,Recurrences, Local Neoplasm,Locoregional Neoplasm Recurrences,Neoplasm Recurrences, Locoregional,Recurrences, Locoregional Neoplasm
D009367 Neoplasm Staging Methods which attempt to express in replicable terms the extent of the neoplasm in the patient. Cancer Staging,Staging, Neoplasm,Tumor Staging,TNM Classification,TNM Staging,TNM Staging System,Classification, TNM,Classifications, TNM,Staging System, TNM,Staging Systems, TNM,Staging, Cancer,Staging, TNM,Staging, Tumor,System, TNM Staging,Systems, TNM Staging,TNM Classifications,TNM Staging Systems
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D011471 Prostatic Neoplasms Tumors or cancer of the PROSTATE. Cancer of Prostate,Prostate Cancer,Cancer of the Prostate,Neoplasms, Prostate,Neoplasms, Prostatic,Prostate Neoplasms,Prostatic Cancer,Cancer, Prostate,Cancer, Prostatic,Cancers, Prostate,Cancers, Prostatic,Neoplasm, Prostate,Neoplasm, Prostatic,Prostate Cancers,Prostate Neoplasm,Prostatic Cancers,Prostatic Neoplasm
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000368 Aged A person 65 years of age or older. For a person older than 79 years, AGED, 80 AND OVER is available. Elderly
D001483 Base Sequence The sequence of PURINES and PYRIMIDINES in nucleic acids and polynucleotides. It is also called nucleotide sequence. DNA Sequence,Nucleotide Sequence,RNA Sequence,DNA Sequences,Base Sequences,Nucleotide Sequences,RNA Sequences,Sequence, Base,Sequence, DNA,Sequence, Nucleotide,Sequence, RNA,Sequences, Base,Sequences, DNA,Sequences, Nucleotide,Sequences, RNA

Related Publications

C L Gao, and S Maheshwari, and R C Dean, and L Tatum, and R Mooneyhan, and R R Connelly, and D G McLeod, and S Srivastava, and J W Moul
November 1997, The Journal of urology,
C L Gao, and S Maheshwari, and R C Dean, and L Tatum, and R Mooneyhan, and R R Connelly, and D G McLeod, and S Srivastava, and J W Moul
January 1999, Clinical & experimental metastasis,
C L Gao, and S Maheshwari, and R C Dean, and L Tatum, and R Mooneyhan, and R R Connelly, and D G McLeod, and S Srivastava, and J W Moul
May 1995, The Journal of urology,
C L Gao, and S Maheshwari, and R C Dean, and L Tatum, and R Mooneyhan, and R R Connelly, and D G McLeod, and S Srivastava, and J W Moul
July 1997, Clinical biochemistry,
C L Gao, and S Maheshwari, and R C Dean, and L Tatum, and R Mooneyhan, and R R Connelly, and D G McLeod, and S Srivastava, and J W Moul
August 1997, The Journal of urology,
C L Gao, and S Maheshwari, and R C Dean, and L Tatum, and R Mooneyhan, and R R Connelly, and D G McLeod, and S Srivastava, and J W Moul
July 1998, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association,
C L Gao, and S Maheshwari, and R C Dean, and L Tatum, and R Mooneyhan, and R R Connelly, and D G McLeod, and S Srivastava, and J W Moul
May 1998, The Journal of urology,
C L Gao, and S Maheshwari, and R C Dean, and L Tatum, and R Mooneyhan, and R R Connelly, and D G McLeod, and S Srivastava, and J W Moul
May 2001, Urology,
C L Gao, and S Maheshwari, and R C Dean, and L Tatum, and R Mooneyhan, and R R Connelly, and D G McLeod, and S Srivastava, and J W Moul
October 2002, BJU international,
C L Gao, and S Maheshwari, and R C Dean, and L Tatum, and R Mooneyhan, and R R Connelly, and D G McLeod, and S Srivastava, and J W Moul
April 1997, Journal of gastroenterology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!