[Assessment of microvascularization around the plaques in Peyronie's disease with Doppler color ultrasonography, power Doppler and ultrasonography contrast media]. 1999
BACKGROUND The origin of Peyronie's disease remains obscure although the first report of this condition dates back to 1743. The disease prevalence in 388.6 in 100,000 population and little physiopathologic information is available. Repeated microtrauma to the tunica albuginea appears to favor the onset of inflammatory phenomena which result in fibrosis and calcification. The disease activity produces a microvascularization around the fibrocalcific plaques. We studied the evolution of the inflammatory process in Peyronie's disease relative to clinical symptoms, in order to optimize treatment follow-up. METHODS We examined 20 patients with Peyronie's disease aged 34 to 56 years using a GE Sonora Logic 500 MD US scanner with linear probes of 7.5 and 13 MHz. The microvascularization around the plaques was studied with color and power Doppler investigations before contrast agent administration and with combined color and power Doppler after contrast agent administration. We injected Levovist (300 mg/mL) and 10 micrograms prostglandin E1 (PGE1). Examinations were repeated after 2-4 months in the patients with evidence of microvascularization around the plaques. RESULTS US demonstrated fibrocalcific plaques in all the patients. The microvascularization around the plaques was seen with color Doppler in 3 cases (15%), with power Doppler in 5 cases (25%) and with contrast-enhanced color and power Doppler in 7 cases (35%). At 2-4 months' follow-up, we observed slight plaque enlargement and worsened symptoms in 5 of 7 patients (71%) with evidence of some microvascularization around the plaque. CONCLUSIONS The plaque presence allows to define the condition and the microvascularization provides information on its evolution. The disease activity can be distinguished into 3 stages which can be related to the painful symptoms. US exhibits a better cost/benefit ratio than contrast-enhanced MRI.