Long-term follow-up after coronary artery bypass grafting reoperation. 1999

I Shapira, and A Isakov, and I Heller, and M Topilsky, and A Pines
Post-Cardiac Surgery Follow-up Clinic, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel. shapiraiz@tasmc.health.gov.il

BACKGROUND Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) reoperation is being performed with increasing frequency. OBJECTIVE To determine the clinical outcome and the long-term results of a second CABG. METHODS An 1100-bed urban university-affiliated hospital. METHODS Retrieval of data on selected parameters from medical records before surgery and prospective follow-up afterwards. METHODS We studied the outcomes of 498 consecutive patients who underwent CABG reoperation in our institution from January 1978 to December 1989 and who were followed postoperatively. Their perioperative mortality, morbidity, and long-term follow-up results were re-evaluated. The end points of the study were December 1997, 15 years of follow-up, or the patient's death. RESULTS The perioperative mortality rate was 3%. The cumulative survival rates were 90.1%, 74%, and 63.4% at the 5-year, 10-year, and 15-year follow-ups, respectively. The cardiac event-free survival rates were 91.5%, 83.4%, and 67.8% at the 5-year, 10-year, and 15-year follow-ups, respectively. The risk factors adversely affecting long-term survival were advanced age, hypertension, and a low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). CONCLUSIONS The long-term results of cumulative survival and cardiac event-free survival in patients who underwent CABG reoperation are good. Although this reoperation is safe overall, advanced age, hypertension, and a decreased LVEF significantly increase the surgical risk.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D011379 Prognosis A prediction of the probable outcome of a disease based on a individual's condition and the usual course of the disease as seen in similar situations. Prognostic Factor,Prognostic Factors,Factor, Prognostic,Factors, Prognostic,Prognoses
D011446 Prospective Studies Observation of a population for a sufficient number of persons over a sufficient number of years to generate incidence or mortality rates subsequent to the selection of the study group. Prospective Study,Studies, Prospective,Study, Prospective
D012086 Reoperation A repeat operation for the same condition in the same patient due to disease progression or recurrence, or as followup to failed previous surgery. Revision, Joint,Revision, Surgical,Surgery, Repeat,Surgical Revision,Repeat Surgery,Revision Surgery,Joint Revision,Revision Surgeries,Surgery, Revision
D003327 Coronary Disease An imbalance between myocardial functional requirements and the capacity of the CORONARY VESSELS to supply sufficient blood flow. It is a form of MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA (insufficient blood supply to the heart muscle) caused by a decreased capacity of the coronary vessels. Coronary Heart Disease,Coronary Diseases,Coronary Heart Diseases,Disease, Coronary,Disease, Coronary Heart,Diseases, Coronary,Diseases, Coronary Heart,Heart Disease, Coronary,Heart Diseases, Coronary
D005260 Female Females
D005500 Follow-Up Studies Studies in which individuals or populations are followed to assess the outcome of exposures, procedures, or effects of a characteristic, e.g., occurrence of disease. Followup Studies,Follow Up Studies,Follow-Up Study,Followup Study,Studies, Follow-Up,Studies, Followup,Study, Follow-Up,Study, Followup
D006083 Graft Occlusion, Vascular Obstruction of flow in biological or prosthetic vascular grafts. Graft Restenosis, Vascular,Vascular Graft Occlusion,Vascular Graft Restenosis,Graft Restenoses, Vascular,Occlusion, Vascular Graft,Restenosis, Vascular Graft
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man

Related Publications

I Shapira, and A Isakov, and I Heller, and M Topilsky, and A Pines
January 1978, Cleveland Clinic quarterly,
I Shapira, and A Isakov, and I Heller, and M Topilsky, and A Pines
September 1983, Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi,
I Shapira, and A Isakov, and I Heller, and M Topilsky, and A Pines
February 1992, [Zasshi] [Journal]. Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai,
I Shapira, and A Isakov, and I Heller, and M Topilsky, and A Pines
July 2007, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery,
I Shapira, and A Isakov, and I Heller, and M Topilsky, and A Pines
November 1994, Current opinion in cardiology,
I Shapira, and A Isakov, and I Heller, and M Topilsky, and A Pines
June 2016, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine,
I Shapira, and A Isakov, and I Heller, and M Topilsky, and A Pines
January 1977, New York state journal of medicine,
I Shapira, and A Isakov, and I Heller, and M Topilsky, and A Pines
January 2018, Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.),
I Shapira, and A Isakov, and I Heller, and M Topilsky, and A Pines
November 1995, The American journal of cardiology,
I Shapira, and A Isakov, and I Heller, and M Topilsky, and A Pines
January 1991, Cardiovascular clinics,
Copied contents to your clipboard!