-transparent.png){kind=logo}
It has been difficult for investigators to simultaneously and reliably evaluate bite force in the intercuspal position with the area and location of occlusal contacts. This study was designed to investigate the variations in these parameters with respect to two factors: three levels of clenching and the preferred chewing side. Human subjects with normal occlusion were examined with a recently developed system (Dental Prescale Occluzer, Fuji Film, Tokyo, Japan). The three levels of clenching intensity were assessed by masseteric EMG activity and included the maximum voluntary contraction, and 30% and 60% of the maximum. The results indicated that the bite force and occlusal contact area on the whole dental arch increased with clenching intensity. In contrast, the average bite pressure, obtained by dividing the bite force by the contact area, remained unchanged regardless of the clenching intensity. As the clenching intensity increased, the medio-lateral position of the bite force balancing point shifted significantly (P<0.01) from the preferred chewing side toward the midline. The antero-posterior position remained stable in a range between the distal third of the first molar and the mesial third of the second molar. The bite force and occlusal contact area, which were mainly on the molars, increased with the clenching intensity, whereas the proportions of these two variables on each upper tooth usually did not change significantly. The exception was the second molar on the non-preferred chewing side. When comparisons were made between pairs of specific upper teeth of same name, usually no significant difference was found in bite force or occlusal contact area, regardless of the clenching level. Again, the exception to this observation was the second molar on the preferred chewing side, which had a larger area at the 30% clenching level. The results in normal subjects suggest that as the clenching intensity increases in the intercuspal position, the bite force adjusts to a position where it is well-balanced. This adjustment may prevent damage and overload to the teeth and temporomandibular joints.
O Hidaka, and
M Iwasaki, and
M Saito, and
T Morimoto
July 2006,
Journal of the American Dental Association (1939),
O Hidaka, and
M Iwasaki, and
M Saito, and
T Morimoto
December 2011,
American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics,
O Hidaka, and
M Iwasaki, and
M Saito, and
T Morimoto
January 2003,
The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry,
O Hidaka, and
M Iwasaki, and
M Saito, and
T Morimoto
June 1988,
Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai zasshi,
O Hidaka, and
M Iwasaki, and
M Saito, and
T Morimoto
November 1999,
Journal of oral rehabilitation,
O Hidaka, and
M Iwasaki, and
M Saito, and
T Morimoto
March 1983,
Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai kaishi,
O Hidaka, and
M Iwasaki, and
M Saito, and
T Morimoto
April 2006,
Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics,
O Hidaka, and
M Iwasaki, and
M Saito, and
T Morimoto
May 2004,
Journal of oral rehabilitation,
O Hidaka, and
M Iwasaki, and
M Saito, and
T Morimoto
August 2009,
Journal of oral rehabilitation,
O Hidaka, and
M Iwasaki, and
M Saito, and
T Morimoto
June 1997,
Journal of dental research,
