Ratio of gamma-seminoprotein to prostate-specific antigen for the detection of prostate cancer: its discrimination power could be influenced by the assay methods of PSA and/or gamma-seminoprotein. 1999

H Akino, and Y Suzuki, and N Oyama, and H Kanamaru, and K Okada
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukui Medical University, Japan.

BACKGROUND The ratio of gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-Sm) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been regarded as being superior over PSA alone as a discriminator between prostate cancer and benign prostatic diseases. In previous studies, PSA and gamma-Sm were measured by the Eiken kit and the old-version or revised Chugai kit, respectively. We compared the power of gamma-Sm ratio with that of PSA alone when using Markit-M PSA assay and the revised Chugai gamma-Sm assay. METHODS Fifty-three patients with prostate cancer having no metastasis and 116 with benign prostatic diseases were enrolled in this study. Prostate-specific antigen was measured by Markit-M kit and gamma-Sm was measured by the revised Chugai kit. The discrimination power of gamma-Sm ratio and PSA alone was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Comparisons between prostate cancer and benign diseases were performed with Mann Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS The optimal cut-off value was set at 3.1 ng/mL for PSA and 0.935 for gamma-Sm ratio. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of PSA alone were 81.1, 81.0 and 66.2%, respectively, while those of gamma-Sm ratio were 73.6, 90.5 and 78.0%, respectively. There was no statistical significance in each value between PSA and gamma-Sm ratio. Areas under the ROC curves of PSA and gamma-Sm ratio were 0.881 and 0.866, respectively (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Contrary to the previous reports, gamma-Sm ratio and PSA were not different in the discrimination between prostate cancer and benign prostatic diseases, which suggested that the discrimination power of gamma-Sm ratio, and presumably that of the free PSA to total PSA ratio as well, could be considerably influenced by the assay kits for serum PSA and/or gamma-Sm (free PSA) used. Therefore, the clinical significance of gamma-Sm ratio should be evaluated for each PSA assay kit.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007118 Immunoassay A technique using antibodies for identifying or quantifying a substance. Usually the substance being studied serves as antigen both in antibody production and in measurement of antibody by the test substance. Immunochromatographic Assay,Assay, Immunochromatographic,Assays, Immunochromatographic,Immunoassays,Immunochromatographic Assays
D008297 Male Males
D009367 Neoplasm Staging Methods which attempt to express in replicable terms the extent of the neoplasm in the patient. Cancer Staging,Staging, Neoplasm,Tumor Staging,TNM Classification,TNM Staging,TNM Staging System,Classification, TNM,Classifications, TNM,Staging System, TNM,Staging Systems, TNM,Staging, Cancer,Staging, TNM,Staging, Tumor,System, TNM Staging,Systems, TNM Staging,TNM Classifications,TNM Staging Systems
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D011470 Prostatic Hyperplasia Increase in constituent cells in the PROSTATE, leading to enlargement of the organ (hypertrophy) and adverse impact on the lower urinary tract function. This can be caused by increased rate of cell proliferation, reduced rate of cell death, or both. Adenoma, Prostatic,Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia,Prostatic Adenoma,Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign,Prostatic Hypertrophy,Prostatic Hypertrophy, Benign,Adenomas, Prostatic,Benign Prostatic Hyperplasias,Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy,Hyperplasia, Benign Prostatic,Hyperplasia, Prostatic,Hyperplasias, Benign Prostatic,Hypertrophies, Prostatic,Hypertrophy, Benign Prostatic,Hypertrophy, Prostatic,Prostatic Adenomas,Prostatic Hyperplasias, Benign,Prostatic Hypertrophies
D011471 Prostatic Neoplasms Tumors or cancer of the PROSTATE. Cancer of Prostate,Prostate Cancer,Cancer of the Prostate,Neoplasms, Prostate,Neoplasms, Prostatic,Prostate Neoplasms,Prostatic Cancer,Cancer, Prostate,Cancer, Prostatic,Cancers, Prostate,Cancers, Prostatic,Neoplasm, Prostate,Neoplasm, Prostatic,Prostate Cancers,Prostate Neoplasm,Prostatic Cancers,Prostatic Neoplasm
D011933 Reagent Kits, Diagnostic Commercially prepared reagent sets, with accessory devices, containing all of the major components and literature necessary to perform one or more designated diagnostic tests or procedures. They may be for laboratory or personal use. Diagnostic Reagent Kits,Diagnostic Reagents and Test Kits,Diagnostic Test Kits,In Vitro Diagnostic Device,In Vitro Diagnostic Devices,In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device,In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices,Kits, Diagnostic Reagent,Diagnostic Reagent Kit,Diagnostic Test Kit,Kit, Diagnostic Reagent,Kit, Diagnostic Test,Kits, Diagnostic Test,Reagent Kit, Diagnostic,Test Kit, Diagnostic,Test Kits, Diagnostic
D012016 Reference Values The range or frequency distribution of a measurement in a population (of organisms, organs or things) that has not been selected for the presence of disease or abnormality. Normal Range,Normal Values,Reference Ranges,Normal Ranges,Normal Value,Range, Normal,Range, Reference,Ranges, Normal,Ranges, Reference,Reference Range,Reference Value,Value, Normal,Value, Reference,Values, Normal,Values, Reference
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D012680 Sensitivity and Specificity Binary classification measures to assess test results. Sensitivity or recall rate is the proportion of true positives. Specificity is the probability of correctly determining the absence of a condition. (From Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) Specificity,Sensitivity,Specificity and Sensitivity

Related Publications

H Akino, and Y Suzuki, and N Oyama, and H Kanamaru, and K Okada
February 1995, Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology,
H Akino, and Y Suzuki, and N Oyama, and H Kanamaru, and K Okada
June 1993, Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology,
H Akino, and Y Suzuki, and N Oyama, and H Kanamaru, and K Okada
May 1994, Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology,
H Akino, and Y Suzuki, and N Oyama, and H Kanamaru, and K Okada
August 2000, Japanese journal of clinical oncology,
H Akino, and Y Suzuki, and N Oyama, and H Kanamaru, and K Okada
January 1994, The Prostate,
H Akino, and Y Suzuki, and N Oyama, and H Kanamaru, and K Okada
January 1991, Urological research,
H Akino, and Y Suzuki, and N Oyama, and H Kanamaru, and K Okada
January 1996, The Prostate. Supplement,
H Akino, and Y Suzuki, and N Oyama, and H Kanamaru, and K Okada
December 1997, Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica,
H Akino, and Y Suzuki, and N Oyama, and H Kanamaru, and K Okada
November 2015, Iranian journal of public health,
Copied contents to your clipboard!