Prognostic factors for subdiaphragmatic involvement in clinical stage I-II supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin's disease: a retrospective analysis of the GHSG. 1999

U Rueffer, and M Sieber, and A Josting, and K Breuer, and F J Grotenhermen, and H Bredenfeld, and H Tesch, and H Nisters-Backes, and A Engert, and V Diehl
Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Cologne, Germany.

BACKGROUND Staging laparotomy and splenectomy were routinely performed in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease (HD) qualifying for radiotherapy alone to determine the exact extent of disease. However, staging laparotomy is associated with a considerable number of side effects, warranting more sophisticated diagnostic procedures and new therapy strategies. We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing staging laparotomy to identify pretherapy risk factors predicting the probability of abdominal disease and to define high-risk groups that might benefit from staging laparotomy and subsequent stage-adjusted treatment. METHODS Between February 1988 and January 1993, 391 patients with CS I-II supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin's disease underwent staging laparotomy and splenectomy according to the treatment policy of the German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (GHSG) for early stages of Hodgkin's disease. Univariate and multivariate analysis of pretherapeutic clinical characteristics were performed in an attempt to predict staging laparotomy results and to identify risk groups. RESULTS Of the 391 patients, 81 (21%) had subdiaphragmatic disease. Eighteen percent were upstaged to PS III and three percent to PS IV. By a multivariate model the following parameters were independent risk factors for positive surgical staging: left cervical involvement (P < 0.001), mediastinal involvement (P < 0.009), Karnofsky performance status (P < 0.004) and histology (P < 0.04). In our analysis gender (P < 0.08) and ESR (P < 0.06), often described as of high prognostic value, was not significant. The presence of systemic symptoms, number of involved areas and clinical stage were not associated with abdominal disease, as described in several former publications. To define high-risk groups, which comprise at least 15% of patients of the cohort and have a risk of subdiaphragmatic involvement of > 35%, combinations of only two or three of the predictive factors were analyzed. With respect to these criteria the following subgroups of patients were identified as having a high risk for subdiaphragmatic disease (> 35%): a) left cervical lymph node involvement and no mediastinal involvement (n = 98, observed risk 36%); b) no mediastinal involvement and MC/LD histology (n = 113, observed risk 40%). CONCLUSIONS We conclude that initial clinical characteristics are predictive for occult abdominal involvement in early clinical stages of Hodgkin's disease. The impact of these risk factors on future therapeutical strategies have to be evaluated.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007813 Laparotomy Incision into the side of the abdomen between the ribs and pelvis. Minilaparotomy,Laparotomies,Minilaparotomies
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D009367 Neoplasm Staging Methods which attempt to express in replicable terms the extent of the neoplasm in the patient. Cancer Staging,Staging, Neoplasm,Tumor Staging,TNM Classification,TNM Staging,TNM Staging System,Classification, TNM,Classifications, TNM,Staging System, TNM,Staging Systems, TNM,Staging, Cancer,Staging, TNM,Staging, Tumor,System, TNM Staging,Systems, TNM Staging,TNM Classifications,TNM Staging Systems
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D011336 Probability The study of chance processes or the relative frequency characterizing a chance process. Probabilities
D011379 Prognosis A prediction of the probable outcome of a disease based on a individual's condition and the usual course of the disease as seen in similar situations. Prognostic Factor,Prognostic Factors,Factor, Prognostic,Factors, Prognostic,Prognoses
D003964 Diaphragm The musculofibrous partition that separates the THORACIC CAVITY from the ABDOMINAL CAVITY. Contraction of the diaphragm increases the volume of the thoracic cavity aiding INHALATION. Respiratory Diaphragm,Diaphragm, Respiratory,Diaphragms,Diaphragms, Respiratory,Respiratory Diaphragms
D005069 Evaluation Studies as Topic Works about studies that determine the effectiveness or value of processes, personnel, and equipment, or the material on conducting such studies. Critique,Evaluation Indexes,Evaluation Methodology,Evaluation Report,Evaluation Research,Methodology, Evaluation,Pre-Post Tests,Qualitative Evaluation,Quantitative Evaluation,Theoretical Effectiveness,Use-Effectiveness,Critiques,Effectiveness, Theoretical,Evaluation Methodologies,Evaluation Reports,Evaluation, Qualitative,Evaluation, Quantitative,Evaluations, Qualitative,Evaluations, Quantitative,Indexes, Evaluation,Methodologies, Evaluation,Pre Post Tests,Pre-Post Test,Qualitative Evaluations,Quantitative Evaluations,Report, Evaluation,Reports, Evaluation,Research, Evaluation,Test, Pre-Post,Tests, Pre-Post,Use Effectiveness
D005260 Female Females

Related Publications

U Rueffer, and M Sieber, and A Josting, and K Breuer, and F J Grotenhermen, and H Bredenfeld, and H Tesch, and H Nisters-Backes, and A Engert, and V Diehl
January 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology,
U Rueffer, and M Sieber, and A Josting, and K Breuer, and F J Grotenhermen, and H Bredenfeld, and H Tesch, and H Nisters-Backes, and A Engert, and V Diehl
July 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics,
U Rueffer, and M Sieber, and A Josting, and K Breuer, and F J Grotenhermen, and H Bredenfeld, and H Tesch, and H Nisters-Backes, and A Engert, and V Diehl
October 1991, Cancer,
U Rueffer, and M Sieber, and A Josting, and K Breuer, and F J Grotenhermen, and H Bredenfeld, and H Tesch, and H Nisters-Backes, and A Engert, and V Diehl
January 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics,
U Rueffer, and M Sieber, and A Josting, and K Breuer, and F J Grotenhermen, and H Bredenfeld, and H Tesch, and H Nisters-Backes, and A Engert, and V Diehl
February 2003, Leukemia & lymphoma,
U Rueffer, and M Sieber, and A Josting, and K Breuer, and F J Grotenhermen, and H Bredenfeld, and H Tesch, and H Nisters-Backes, and A Engert, and V Diehl
January 1986, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology,
U Rueffer, and M Sieber, and A Josting, and K Breuer, and F J Grotenhermen, and H Bredenfeld, and H Tesch, and H Nisters-Backes, and A Engert, and V Diehl
January 1983, Hematological oncology,
U Rueffer, and M Sieber, and A Josting, and K Breuer, and F J Grotenhermen, and H Bredenfeld, and H Tesch, and H Nisters-Backes, and A Engert, and V Diehl
January 1991, Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden),
U Rueffer, and M Sieber, and A Josting, and K Breuer, and F J Grotenhermen, and H Bredenfeld, and H Tesch, and H Nisters-Backes, and A Engert, and V Diehl
January 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology,
U Rueffer, and M Sieber, and A Josting, and K Breuer, and F J Grotenhermen, and H Bredenfeld, and H Tesch, and H Nisters-Backes, and A Engert, and V Diehl
July 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics,
Copied contents to your clipboard!