-transparent.png){kind=logo}
BACKGROUND Numerous studies of steroid withdrawal have been carried out in kidney and liver transplant recipients, but only a few in pancreas transplant recipients. Yet, pancreas transplant recipients could have significant long-term benefits from steroid withdrawal. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis to determine the feasibility of steroid withdrawal in pancreas transplant recipients. RESULTS Of 360 recipients who underwent a pancreas transplant between January 1, 1994 and June 30, 1998, 14 attempted steroid withdrawal (12 simultaneous pancreas-kidney [SPK]; 2 pancreas transplant alone [PTA]). Reasons for steroid withdrawal were bone fractures (n = 3), psychiatric disorders (n = 2), severe acne (n = 1), recurrent infections (n = 4), and problems with hypercholesterolemia or hypertension (n = 4). All 14 were maintained on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) immunosuppression, except for 1 who was on tacrolimus and azathioprine (AZA). Of the 14 recipients, 11 had no episodes of acute rejection before steroid withdrawal. The remaining 3 had one or more acute rejection episodes. Of the 14 recipients, 10 (72%) currently remain off steroids (mean follow-up 18 months, range 5-51 months). However, 4 recipients have resumed steroids: 2 after an acute rejection episode (at 2 and 21 months post-withdrawal) and 2 because of leukopenia (WBC < 3000) and an inability to tolerate full-dose MMF. Steroid withdrawal was unsuccessful in both PTA recipients and in 2 of the 12 SPK recipients. All 14 recipients currently have a functioning pancreas graft. However, 1 of the SPK recipients, in whom steroid withdrawal failed, has developed chronic kidney rejection and is now back on hemodialysis awaiting a retransplant. CONCLUSIONS Steroid withdrawal is possible in up to 70% of pancreas transplant recipients. Further studies are necessary to define ideal candidates for steroid withdrawal. Based on the results of this analysis, we have launched a prospective, randomized trial of steroid withdrawal in pancreas transplant recipients.
A Humar, and
E Parr, and
M B Drangstveit, and
R Kandaswamy, and
A C Gruessner, and
D E Sutherland
September 2014,
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews,
A Humar, and
E Parr, and
M B Drangstveit, and
R Kandaswamy, and
A C Gruessner, and
D E Sutherland
February 2000,
Transplantation proceedings,
A Humar, and
E Parr, and
M B Drangstveit, and
R Kandaswamy, and
A C Gruessner, and
D E Sutherland
November 2005,
Transplantation proceedings,
A Humar, and
E Parr, and
M B Drangstveit, and
R Kandaswamy, and
A C Gruessner, and
D E Sutherland
September 1990,
Nihon Jinzo Gakkai shi,
A Humar, and
E Parr, and
M B Drangstveit, and
R Kandaswamy, and
A C Gruessner, and
D E Sutherland
January 2001,
Transplantation proceedings,
A Humar, and
E Parr, and
M B Drangstveit, and
R Kandaswamy, and
A C Gruessner, and
D E Sutherland
September 2001,
Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.),
A Humar, and
E Parr, and
M B Drangstveit, and
R Kandaswamy, and
A C Gruessner, and
D E Sutherland
December 2000,
Transplantation proceedings,
A Humar, and
E Parr, and
M B Drangstveit, and
R Kandaswamy, and
A C Gruessner, and
D E Sutherland
January 2001,
Transplantation proceedings,
A Humar, and
E Parr, and
M B Drangstveit, and
R Kandaswamy, and
A C Gruessner, and
D E Sutherland
February 2002,
Transplantation proceedings,
A Humar, and
E Parr, and
M B Drangstveit, and
R Kandaswamy, and
A C Gruessner, and
D E Sutherland
February 1988,
Transplantation,
