Randomised controlled trial of nurse practitioner versus general practitioner care for patients requesting "same day" consultations in primary care. 2000

P Kinnersley, and E Anderson, and K Parry, and J Clement, and L Archard, and P Turton, and A Stainthorpe, and A Fraser, and C C Butler, and C Rogers
Department of General Practice, University of Wales College of Medicine, Llanedeyrn Health Centre, Cardiff CF3 7PN.

OBJECTIVE To ascertain any differences between care from nurse practitioners and that from general practitioners for patients seeking "same day" consultations in primary care. METHODS Randomised controlled trial with patients allocated by one of two randomisation schemes (by day or within day). METHODS 10 general practices in south Wales and south west England. METHODS 1368 patients requesting same day consultations. METHODS Patient satisfaction, resolution of symptoms and concerns, care provided (prescriptions, investigations, referrals, recall, and length of consultation), information provided to patients, and patients' intentions for seeking care in the future. RESULTS Generally patients consulting nurse practitioners were significantly more satisfied with their care, although for adults this difference was not observed in all practices. For children, the mean difference between general and nurse practitioner in percentage satisfaction score was -4.8 (95% confidence interval -6.8 to -2.8), and for adults the differences ranged from -8.8 (-13.6 to -3.9) to 3.8 (-3.3 to 10.8) across the practices. Resolution of symptoms and concerns did not differ between the two groups (odds ratio 1.2 (95% confidence interval 0.8 to 1.8) for symptoms and 1.03 (0.8 to 1.4) for concerns). The number of prescriptions issued, investigations ordered, referrals to secondary care, and reattendances were similar between the two groups. However, patients managed by nurse practitioners reported receiving significantly more information about their illnesses and, in all but one practice, their consultations were significantly longer. CONCLUSIONS This study supports the wider acceptance of the role of nurse practitioners in providing care to patients requesting same day consultations.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007223 Infant A child between 1 and 23 months of age. Infants
D007231 Infant, Newborn An infant during the first 28 days after birth. Neonate,Newborns,Infants, Newborn,Neonates,Newborn,Newborn Infant,Newborn Infants
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D009722 Nurse Practitioners Nurses who are specially trained to assume an expanded role in providing medical care under the supervision of a physician. Nurse Practitioner,Practitioner, Nurse,Practitioners, Nurse
D010342 Patient Acceptance of Health Care Patients' willingness to receive health care. Acceptability of Health Care,Health Care Seeking Behavior,Acceptability of Healthcare,Acceptors of Health Care,Health Care Utilization,Nonacceptors of Health Care,Patient Acceptance of Healthcare,Care Acceptor, Health,Care Acceptors, Health,Care Nonacceptor, Health,Care Nonacceptors, Health,Health Care Acceptability,Health Care Acceptor,Health Care Acceptors,Health Care Nonacceptor,Health Care Nonacceptors,Healthcare Acceptabilities,Healthcare Acceptability,Healthcare Patient Acceptance,Healthcare Patient Acceptances,Utilization, Health Care
D002648 Child A person 6 to 12 years of age. An individual 2 to 5 years old is CHILD, PRESCHOOL. Children
D002675 Child, Preschool A child between the ages of 2 and 5. Children, Preschool,Preschool Child,Preschool Children
D004739 England A part of Great Britain within the United Kingdom.
D005194 Family Practice A medical specialty concerned with the provision of continuing, comprehensive primary health care for the entire family. Family Practices,Practice, Family,Practices, Family

Related Publications

P Kinnersley, and E Anderson, and K Parry, and J Clement, and L Archard, and P Turton, and A Stainthorpe, and A Fraser, and C C Butler, and C Rogers
October 2004, BMJ (Clinical research ed.),
P Kinnersley, and E Anderson, and K Parry, and J Clement, and L Archard, and P Turton, and A Stainthorpe, and A Fraser, and C C Butler, and C Rogers
January 2013, Trials,
P Kinnersley, and E Anderson, and K Parry, and J Clement, and L Archard, and P Turton, and A Stainthorpe, and A Fraser, and C C Butler, and C Rogers
April 2002, The New Zealand medical journal,
P Kinnersley, and E Anderson, and K Parry, and J Clement, and L Archard, and P Turton, and A Stainthorpe, and A Fraser, and C C Butler, and C Rogers
February 2003, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners,
P Kinnersley, and E Anderson, and K Parry, and J Clement, and L Archard, and P Turton, and A Stainthorpe, and A Fraser, and C C Butler, and C Rogers
April 2002, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners,
P Kinnersley, and E Anderson, and K Parry, and J Clement, and L Archard, and P Turton, and A Stainthorpe, and A Fraser, and C C Butler, and C Rogers
August 2002, Thorax,
P Kinnersley, and E Anderson, and K Parry, and J Clement, and L Archard, and P Turton, and A Stainthorpe, and A Fraser, and C C Butler, and C Rogers
January 2002, Health technology assessment (Winchester, England),
P Kinnersley, and E Anderson, and K Parry, and J Clement, and L Archard, and P Turton, and A Stainthorpe, and A Fraser, and C C Butler, and C Rogers
February 2004, BMJ (Clinical research ed.),
P Kinnersley, and E Anderson, and K Parry, and J Clement, and L Archard, and P Turton, and A Stainthorpe, and A Fraser, and C C Butler, and C Rogers
April 2000, BMJ (Clinical research ed.),
P Kinnersley, and E Anderson, and K Parry, and J Clement, and L Archard, and P Turton, and A Stainthorpe, and A Fraser, and C C Butler, and C Rogers
December 1997, Lancet (London, England),
Copied contents to your clipboard!