-transparent.png){kind=logo}
OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the conservative management in patients with acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma). METHODS This retrospective study was performed in a university hospital. METHODS Patients were selected for this wait-and-see policy on the basis of age, general condition, audiometric results, tumor size, and patient preference. The study group included 97 patients, 87 of whom had at least two neuroradiologic examinations. The mean age of this population was 63 years (29 to 89 years). The mean length of follow-up of this population was 31 months. Eighty-seven of these patients had at least two radiologic examinations (magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography). The mean interval between the initial and follow-up radiologic examinations was 15 months. METHODS Tumor size was measured by use of two-dimensional data in all patients. The mean tumor size was 12 mm. The growth rate of the tumor was estimated by comparison of the results of the measurements from the initial and follow-up neuroradiologic examinations. RESULTS Of the 97 patients studied, 6 patients required surgery and 6 required radiotherapy. Sixty patients (62%) were still being treated conservatively at the end of the study period. Three patients of 28 who were classified as candidates for hearing preservation surgery lost their candidacy during the observation period. The mean annual tumor growth rate was 1.52 mm/year. The tumor was stable in size in 36% of patients, regressed in 11% of patients, or grew in 53% of patients. The growth patterns of the acoustic neuroma fell into five categories: continuous growth in 15% of patients, negative growth in 5%, growth followed by negative growth in 40%, negative growth followed by growth in 20%, and no variation of tumor size in 20%. CONCLUSIONS Conservative management of acoustic neuromas carries difficulties: long-term follow-up of the patients and unpredictability of the tumor growth pattern. A reliable and reproducible radiologic method for evaluating tumor size is of great importance.
Y J Shin, and
B Fraysse, and
C Cognard, and
I Gafsi, and
J P Charlet, and
C Berges, and
O Deguine, and
M Tremoulet
June 1992,
Otolaryngologic clinics of North America,
Y J Shin, and
B Fraysse, and
C Cognard, and
I Gafsi, and
J P Charlet, and
C Berges, and
O Deguine, and
M Tremoulet
April 2008,
Neurosurgery clinics of North America,
Y J Shin, and
B Fraysse, and
C Cognard, and
I Gafsi, and
J P Charlet, and
C Berges, and
O Deguine, and
M Tremoulet
September 2000,
The American journal of otology,
Y J Shin, and
B Fraysse, and
C Cognard, and
I Gafsi, and
J P Charlet, and
C Berges, and
O Deguine, and
M Tremoulet
June 2005,
The Journal of laryngology and otology,
Y J Shin, and
B Fraysse, and
C Cognard, and
I Gafsi, and
J P Charlet, and
C Berges, and
O Deguine, and
M Tremoulet
June 1993,
Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences,
Y J Shin, and
B Fraysse, and
C Cognard, and
I Gafsi, and
J P Charlet, and
C Berges, and
O Deguine, and
M Tremoulet
January 1993,
Annales d'oto-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico faciale : bulletin de la Societe d'oto-laryngologie des hopitaux de Paris,
Y J Shin, and
B Fraysse, and
C Cognard, and
I Gafsi, and
J P Charlet, and
C Berges, and
O Deguine, and
M Tremoulet
June 2011,
The Laryngoscope,
Y J Shin, and
B Fraysse, and
C Cognard, and
I Gafsi, and
J P Charlet, and
C Berges, and
O Deguine, and
M Tremoulet
August 1988,
Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery],
Y J Shin, and
B Fraysse, and
C Cognard, and
I Gafsi, and
J P Charlet, and
C Berges, and
O Deguine, and
M Tremoulet
January 1981,
Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie,
Y J Shin, and
B Fraysse, and
C Cognard, and
I Gafsi, and
J P Charlet, and
C Berges, and
O Deguine, and
M Tremoulet
February 1983,
The Journal of the Indiana State Medical Association,
