Effectiveness and economic impact of screening for colorectal cancer by mass fecal occult blood testing. 2000

J F Helm, and M W Russo, and A K Biddle, and K N Simpson, and D F Ransohoff, and R S Sandler
Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease and Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.

OBJECTIVE Fecal occult blood testing has been shown to reduce mortality from colorectal cancer in large randomized, controlled trials conducted in the United States, Denmark, and the United Kingdom, and mathematical simulation modeling found it to be cost-effective relative to other health care services. Before making a concerted effort to implement mass fecal occult blood testing based on this evidence alone, however, we considered it prudent to critically re-evaluate the effectiveness and economic impact of screening in the US population as a whole. METHODS To assess the effectiveness of screening, we projected published outcomes from each of the three large randomized controlled trials of fecal occult blood testing to the US population, as if each clinical trial had been done in the population as a whole. We then determined the resource costs of detection and treatment that would be associated with the outcomes predicted from each trial. RESULTS More than 1 million colorectal cancers could be expected to arise over 10 yr in the cohort of US residents eligible to enter a screening program in 1997, and trial outcomes indicate that > or = 60% of these cancers would be fatal. If the 60-67% compliance rate of the population-based randomized controlled trials were achieved, a fecal occult blood testing program would detect 30% of known colorectal cancers and save 100,000 lives over 10 yr. Screening would incur total costs of $3-4 billion over 10 yr, or $2,500 per life-year saved. CONCLUSIONS Mass fecal occult blood testing is cost-effective, and, although not inexpensive, many would consider the total cost acceptable. Even with a concerted effort to achieve compliance, however, the effectiveness of fecal occult blood testing would be limited to saving the lives of < or = 15% of those who otherwise would die from their cancer in the first 10 yr after beginning mass screening. The limitations of fecal occult blood testing suggest the need to further evaluate the role of endoscopy in screening, and to develop more effective, noninvasive screening tools.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008403 Mass Screening Organized periodic procedures performed on large groups of people for the purpose of detecting disease. Screening,Mass Screenings,Screening, Mass,Screenings,Screenings, Mass
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D009780 Occult Blood Chemical, spectroscopic, or microscopic detection of extremely small amounts of blood. Fecal Occult Blood Test,Blood, Occult
D003198 Computer Simulation Computer-based representation of physical systems and phenomena such as chemical processes. Computational Modeling,Computational Modelling,Computer Models,In silico Modeling,In silico Models,In silico Simulation,Models, Computer,Computerized Models,Computer Model,Computer Simulations,Computerized Model,In silico Model,Model, Computer,Model, Computerized,Model, In silico,Modeling, Computational,Modeling, In silico,Modelling, Computational,Simulation, Computer,Simulation, In silico,Simulations, Computer
D003362 Cost-Benefit Analysis A method of comparing the cost of a program with its expected benefits in dollars (or other currency). The benefit-to-cost ratio is a measure of total return expected per unit of money spent. This analysis generally excludes consideration of factors that are not measured ultimately in economic terms. In contrast a cost effectiveness in general compares cost with qualitative outcomes. Cost and Benefit,Cost-Benefit Data,Benefits and Costs,Cost Benefit,Cost Benefit Analysis,Cost-Utility Analysis,Costs and Benefits,Economic Evaluation,Marginal Analysis,Analyses, Cost Benefit,Analysis, Cost Benefit,Analysis, Cost-Benefit,Analysis, Cost-Utility,Analysis, Marginal,Benefit and Cost,Cost Benefit Analyses,Cost Benefit Data,Cost Utility Analysis,Cost-Benefit Analyses,Cost-Utility Analyses,Data, Cost-Benefit,Economic Evaluations,Evaluation, Economic,Marginal Analyses
D003365 Costs and Cost Analysis Absolute, comparative, or differential costs pertaining to services, institutions, resources, etc., or the analysis and study of these costs. Affordability,Analysis, Cost,Cost,Cost Analysis,Cost Comparison,Cost Measures,Cost-Minimization Analysis,Costs and Cost Analyses,Costs, Cost Analysis,Pricing,Affordabilities,Analyses, Cost,Analyses, Cost-Minimization,Analysis, Cost-Minimization,Comparison, Cost,Comparisons, Cost,Cost Analyses,Cost Comparisons,Cost Measure,Cost Minimization Analysis,Cost, Cost Analysis,Cost-Minimization Analyses,Costs,Measure, Cost,Measures, Cost
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000368 Aged A person 65 years of age or older. For a person older than 79 years, AGED, 80 AND OVER is available. Elderly
D014481 United States A country in NORTH AMERICA between CANADA and MEXICO.
D015179 Colorectal Neoplasms Tumors or cancer of the COLON or the RECTUM or both. Risk factors for colorectal cancer include chronic ULCERATIVE COLITIS; FAMILIAL POLYPOSIS COLI; exposure to ASBESTOS; and irradiation of the CERVIX UTERI. Colorectal Cancer,Colorectal Carcinoma,Colorectal Tumors,Neoplasms, Colorectal,Cancer, Colorectal,Cancers, Colorectal,Carcinoma, Colorectal,Carcinomas, Colorectal,Colorectal Cancers,Colorectal Carcinomas,Colorectal Neoplasm,Colorectal Tumor,Neoplasm, Colorectal,Tumor, Colorectal,Tumors, Colorectal

Related Publications

J F Helm, and M W Russo, and A K Biddle, and K N Simpson, and D F Ransohoff, and R S Sandler
June 1986, Cancer,
J F Helm, and M W Russo, and A K Biddle, and K N Simpson, and D F Ransohoff, and R S Sandler
December 2005, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien,
J F Helm, and M W Russo, and A K Biddle, and K N Simpson, and D F Ransohoff, and R S Sandler
October 1996, Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann,
J F Helm, and M W Russo, and A K Biddle, and K N Simpson, and D F Ransohoff, and R S Sandler
January 1979, Frontiers of gastrointestinal research,
J F Helm, and M W Russo, and A K Biddle, and K N Simpson, and D F Ransohoff, and R S Sandler
June 2008, Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas,
J F Helm, and M W Russo, and A K Biddle, and K N Simpson, and D F Ransohoff, and R S Sandler
October 1991, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy,
J F Helm, and M W Russo, and A K Biddle, and K N Simpson, and D F Ransohoff, and R S Sandler
August 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute,
J F Helm, and M W Russo, and A K Biddle, and K N Simpson, and D F Ransohoff, and R S Sandler
May 2005, Nature clinical practice. Oncology,
J F Helm, and M W Russo, and A K Biddle, and K N Simpson, and D F Ransohoff, and R S Sandler
July 2011, Diseases of the colon and rectum,
J F Helm, and M W Russo, and A K Biddle, and K N Simpson, and D F Ransohoff, and R S Sandler
May 2003, Revue medicale de Liege,
Copied contents to your clipboard!