-transparent.png){kind=logo}
A Syphilis Serology Proficiency Testing Program revealed that 182 of the 272 (67 percent) participating laboratories failed to report acceptable results for a minimally reactive pair of serum samples. It was noted that serious technical errors involved the antigen, use of controls, procedures and in some cases, the lack of training. A program involving strict quality control measures is presented for use in routine syphilis serologic procedures.
Related Publications
R P Neimeister, and
R Teschemacher, and
I J Yankevitch, and
J Cocklin
January 1986,
NIDA research monograph,
R P Neimeister, and
R Teschemacher, and
I J Yankevitch, and
J Cocklin
October 1976,
Clinical chemistry,
R P Neimeister, and
R Teschemacher, and
I J Yankevitch, and
J Cocklin
July 1992,
Clinical chemistry,
R P Neimeister, and
R Teschemacher, and
I J Yankevitch, and
J Cocklin
January 2002,
Archives of andrology,
R P Neimeister, and
R Teschemacher, and
I J Yankevitch, and
J Cocklin
April 1988,
Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine,
R P Neimeister, and
R Teschemacher, and
I J Yankevitch, and
J Cocklin
September 1996,
Clinics in laboratory medicine,
R P Neimeister, and
R Teschemacher, and
I J Yankevitch, and
J Cocklin
February 1978,
Federal register,
R P Neimeister, and
R Teschemacher, and
I J Yankevitch, and
J Cocklin
May 1951,
The X-ray technician,
R P Neimeister, and
R Teschemacher, and
I J Yankevitch, and
J Cocklin
December 2014,
BMJ open,
R P Neimeister, and
R Teschemacher, and
I J Yankevitch, and
J Cocklin
July 1978,
Journal of clinical microbiology,
