Impact of cyclosporine withdrawal on living related renal transplants: a single-center experience. 2001

V Jha, and T Muthukumar, and H S Kohli, and K Sud, and K L Gupta, and V Sakhuja
Department of Nephrology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. vjha@iname.com

High treatment costs force the discontinuation of cyclosporine (CSA) in a vast majority of renal transplant recipients in India. The impact of CSA withdrawal among 108 living related renal transplant recipients 12.54 +/- 4.2 months after transplantation was studied retrospectively. In 83 patients, CSA was withdrawn over a 12-week period (group I). Azathioprine dosage was increased to 2 to 2.5 mg/kg/d, and prednisolone, to 30 mg/d 2 weeks and 1 week before starting CSA withdrawal, respectively. In the other 25 patients, CSA had to be withdrawn faster (mean, 28.52 +/- 14.18 days; group II). Twenty-nine rejection episodes (26.9%) were noted in 22 patients (20.4%; 19% in group I and 52% in group II; P: = 0.008). Fifteen group-I patients (18%) and 11 group-II patients (44%) died or lost their grafts (P: = 0.017). There was no difference in age, donor source, HLA matches, pretransplantation cross-match positivity, delayed graft function, immunosuppressive drug doses, rejection episodes, or prewithdrawal serum creatinine levels between the patients who did or did not develop acute rejection after CSA withdrawal. On follow-up, 10 patients (50%) died or returned to dialysis among the rejection group compared with 16 patients (18%) in the nonrejection group (P: = 0.007). The mean creatinine level at last follow-up was greater in the rejection group (3.97 +/- 2.54 versus 1.65 +/- 1.1 mg/dL; P: < 0.001). CSA withdrawal because of economic constraints carries a significant risk for acute rejection and death and/or graft loss in Indian living donor renal transplant recipients, even after 12 months.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007166 Immunosuppressive Agents Agents that suppress immune function by one of several mechanisms of action. Classical cytotoxic immunosuppressants act by inhibiting DNA synthesis. Others may act through activation of T-CELLS or by inhibiting the activation of HELPER CELLS. While immunosuppression has been brought about in the past primarily to prevent rejection of transplanted organs, new applications involving mediation of the effects of INTERLEUKINS and other CYTOKINES are emerging. Immunosuppressant,Immunosuppressive Agent,Immunosuppressants,Agent, Immunosuppressive,Agents, Immunosuppressive
D007194 India A country in southern Asia, bordering the Arabian Sea and the Bay of Bengal, between Burma and Pakistan. The capitol is New Delhi. Republic of India
D008297 Male Males
D011239 Prednisolone A glucocorticoid with the general properties of the corticosteroids. It is the drug of choice for all conditions in which routine systemic corticosteroid therapy is indicated, except adrenal deficiency states. Di-Adreson-F,Predate,Predonine,Di Adreson F,DiAdresonF
D002423 Cause of Death Factors which produce cessation of all vital bodily functions. They can be analyzed from an epidemiologic viewpoint. Causes of Death,Death Cause,Death Causes
D003404 Creatinine Creatinine Sulfate Salt,Krebiozen,Salt, Creatinine Sulfate,Sulfate Salt, Creatinine
D005260 Female Females
D005500 Follow-Up Studies Studies in which individuals or populations are followed to assess the outcome of exposures, procedures, or effects of a characteristic, e.g., occurrence of disease. Followup Studies,Follow Up Studies,Follow-Up Study,Followup Study,Studies, Follow-Up,Studies, Followup,Study, Follow-Up,Study, Followup
D006084 Graft Rejection An immune response with both cellular and humoral components, directed against an allogeneic transplant, whose tissue antigens are not compatible with those of the recipient. Transplant Rejection,Rejection, Transplant,Transplantation Rejection,Graft Rejections,Rejection, Graft,Rejection, Transplantation,Rejections, Graft,Rejections, Transplant,Rejections, Transplantation,Transplant Rejections,Transplantation Rejections
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man

Related Publications

V Jha, and T Muthukumar, and H S Kohli, and K Sud, and K L Gupta, and V Sakhuja
April 2002, Pediatric transplantation,
V Jha, and T Muthukumar, and H S Kohli, and K Sud, and K L Gupta, and V Sakhuja
January 1988, Clinical transplants,
V Jha, and T Muthukumar, and H S Kohli, and K Sud, and K L Gupta, and V Sakhuja
October 1987, Transplantation proceedings,
V Jha, and T Muthukumar, and H S Kohli, and K Sud, and K L Gupta, and V Sakhuja
March 2004, Transplantation proceedings,
V Jha, and T Muthukumar, and H S Kohli, and K Sud, and K L Gupta, and V Sakhuja
August 2001, Annals of surgery,
V Jha, and T Muthukumar, and H S Kohli, and K Sud, and K L Gupta, and V Sakhuja
July 2012, The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India,
V Jha, and T Muthukumar, and H S Kohli, and K Sud, and K L Gupta, and V Sakhuja
January 1992, Clinical transplants,
V Jha, and T Muthukumar, and H S Kohli, and K Sud, and K L Gupta, and V Sakhuja
August 2001, Transplantation proceedings,
V Jha, and T Muthukumar, and H S Kohli, and K Sud, and K L Gupta, and V Sakhuja
June 2011, Transplantation proceedings,
V Jha, and T Muthukumar, and H S Kohli, and K Sud, and K L Gupta, and V Sakhuja
December 1994, Transplantation,
Copied contents to your clipboard!