Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures: a biomechanical comparison of two techniques. 2001

M G Dennis, and J A Simon, and F J Kummer, and K J Koval, and P E Di Cesare
The Musculoskeletal Research Center, The Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopaedic Institute, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, U.S.A.

OBJECTIVE To determine which of two currently used techniques for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures provides the greater fixation rigidity and strength. METHODS A laboratory study using six matched pairs of femurs. METHODS Embalmed femur prosthesis constructs had a simulated periprosthetic fracture created and were fixed with a plate with proximal cables and distal bicortical screws (Ogden concept) or two allograft struts and cables. Fixation stability was compared in various loading modalities before and after cycling. They were then tested to failure. METHODS Fixation rigidity was defined as the ratio of applied load to the amount of displacement at the fracture. RESULTS In all loading modalities, the Ogden construct was more rigid than the allograft strut fixation. The Ogden construct required 1,295 newtons for failure and the allograft strut fixation required 950 newtons (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The Ogden construct provided a more rigid and stronger initial fixation of a periprosthetic fracture than did the allograft construct.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008422 Materials Testing The testing of materials and devices, especially those used for PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SUTURES; TISSUE ADHESIVES; etc., for hardness, strength, durability, safety, efficacy, and biocompatibility. Biocompatibility Testing,Biocompatible Materials Testing,Hemocompatibility Testing,Testing, Biocompatible Materials,Testing, Hemocompatible Materials,Hemocompatibility Testings,Hemocompatible Materials Testing,Materials Testing, Biocompatible,Materials Testing, Hemocompatible,Testing, Biocompatibility,Testing, Hemocompatibility,Testing, Materials,Testings, Biocompatibility
D011336 Probability The study of chance processes or the relative frequency characterizing a chance process. Probabilities
D011474 Prosthesis Design The plan and delineation of prostheses in general or a specific prosthesis. Design, Prosthesis,Designs, Prosthesis,Prosthesis Designs
D011475 Prosthesis Failure Malfunction of implantation shunts, valves, etc., and prosthesis loosening, migration, and breaking. Prosthesis Loosening,Prosthesis Durability,Prosthesis Migration,Prosthesis Survival,Durabilities, Prosthesis,Durability, Prosthesis,Failure, Prosthesis,Failures, Prosthesis,Loosening, Prosthesis,Loosenings, Prosthesis,Migration, Prosthesis,Migrations, Prosthesis,Prosthesis Durabilities,Prosthesis Failures,Prosthesis Loosenings,Prosthesis Migrations,Prosthesis Survivals,Survival, Prosthesis,Survivals, Prosthesis
D011859 Radiography Examination of any part of the body for diagnostic purposes by means of X-RAYS or GAMMA RAYS, recording the image on a sensitized surface (such as photographic film). Radiology, Diagnostic X-Ray,Roentgenography,X-Ray, Diagnostic,Diagnostic X-Ray,Diagnostic X-Ray Radiology,X-Ray Radiology, Diagnostic,Diagnostic X Ray,Diagnostic X Ray Radiology,Diagnostic X-Rays,Radiology, Diagnostic X Ray,X Ray Radiology, Diagnostic,X Ray, Diagnostic,X-Rays, Diagnostic
D002102 Cadaver A dead body, usually a human body. Corpse,Cadavers,Corpses
D005264 Femoral Fractures Fractures of the femur. Femoral Fracture,Fracture, Femoral,Fractures, Femoral
D005593 Fracture Fixation, Internal The use of internal devices (metal plates, nails, rods, etc.) to hold the position of a fracture in proper alignment. Osteosynthesis, Fracture,Fixation, Internal Fracture,Fixations, Internal Fracture,Fracture Fixations, Internal,Fracture Osteosyntheses,Fracture Osteosynthesis,Internal Fracture Fixation,Internal Fracture Fixations,Osteosyntheses, Fracture
D006622 Hip Prosthesis Replacement for a hip joint. Femoral Head Prosthesis,Femoral Head Prostheses,Hip Prostheses,Prostheses, Femoral Head,Prostheses, Hip,Prosthesis, Femoral Head,Prosthesis, Hip
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man

Related Publications

M G Dennis, and J A Simon, and F J Kummer, and K J Koval, and P E Di Cesare
September 2020, Journal of orthopaedic translation,
M G Dennis, and J A Simon, and F J Kummer, and K J Koval, and P E Di Cesare
February 2023, Journal of wrist surgery,
M G Dennis, and J A Simon, and F J Kummer, and K J Koval, and P E Di Cesare
February 2006, Journal of orthopaedic trauma,
M G Dennis, and J A Simon, and F J Kummer, and K J Koval, and P E Di Cesare
September 2012, International orthopaedics,
M G Dennis, and J A Simon, and F J Kummer, and K J Koval, and P E Di Cesare
January 2016, Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica,
M G Dennis, and J A Simon, and F J Kummer, and K J Koval, and P E Di Cesare
July 2021, International orthopaedics,
M G Dennis, and J A Simon, and F J Kummer, and K J Koval, and P E Di Cesare
September 2015, International orthopaedics,
M G Dennis, and J A Simon, and F J Kummer, and K J Koval, and P E Di Cesare
January 1978, Clinical orthopaedics and related research,
M G Dennis, and J A Simon, and F J Kummer, and K J Koval, and P E Di Cesare
October 2012, World journal of orthopedics,
M G Dennis, and J A Simon, and F J Kummer, and K J Koval, and P E Di Cesare
August 1990, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie,
Copied contents to your clipboard!