The authors contend that the conventional flap (LAF) and the ELAF should be considered among the best choices of all possible fasciocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Easy and quick dissection under tourniquet, design variability, and potential sensory innervation make these flaps superior to other fasciocutaneous flaps. The ELAF provides the same pliable, thin fasciocutaneous tissue and a longer pedicle than the RFF. In contrast to the RFF, the donor site can be closed primarily and heals with an acceptable scar without any functional deficit. The authors therefore strongly recommend clinical application of these flaps in head and neck reconstruction.