Effects of training dose on amphetamine drug discrimination: dose-response functions and generalization to cocaine. 2001

J R Stadler, and W F Caul, and R J Barrett
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, 301 Wilson Hall, Nashville, TN 37203, USA. jonathan.r.stadler@vanderbilt.edu

Rats were trained to discriminate one of three doses of amphetamine (AM), 0.5, 1, or 2 mg/kg, from vehicle (VEH) in a two-lever, food-reinforced, drug-discrimination task. The purpose of the study was to investigate the nature of the shift of the dose-response curve and generalization to cocaine (COC) as a function of training dose. In order to preclude potential differences among the groups in stimulus control, the three training-dose groups were required to perform the discrimination at high and equivalent levels of accuracy. The shift of the dose-response functions to the right as a function of increasing training dose was not parallel. The slope decreased as training dose increased. There was a dose-dependent increase in AM lever responding to test doses of COC that tended to be affected by training dose. The results suggest that proper evaluation of training-dose effects requires that groups be trained to equivalent levels of stimulus control.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007274 Injections, Intraperitoneal Forceful administration into the peritoneal cavity of liquid medication, nutrient, or other fluid through a hollow needle piercing the abdominal wall. Intraperitoneal Injections,Injection, Intraperitoneal,Intraperitoneal Injection
D008297 Male Males
D002755 Choice Behavior The act of making a selection among two or more alternatives, usually after a period of deliberation. Approach Behavior,Approach Behaviors,Behavior, Approach,Behavior, Choice,Behaviors, Approach,Behaviors, Choice,Choice Behaviors
D003042 Cocaine An alkaloid ester extracted from the leaves of plants including coca. It is a local anesthetic and vasoconstrictor and is clinically used for that purpose, particularly in the eye, ear, nose, and throat. It also has powerful central nervous system effects similar to the amphetamines and is a drug of abuse. Cocaine, like amphetamines, acts by multiple mechanisms on brain catecholaminergic neurons; the mechanism of its reinforcing effects is thought to involve inhibition of dopamine uptake. Cocaine HCl,Cocaine Hydrochloride,HCl, Cocaine,Hydrochloride, Cocaine
D004193 Discrimination Learning Learning that is manifested in the ability to respond differentially to various stimuli. Discriminative Learning,Discrimination Learnings,Discriminative Learnings,Learning, Discrimination,Learning, Discriminative
D004305 Dose-Response Relationship, Drug The relationship between the dose of an administered drug and the response of the organism to the drug. Dose Response Relationship, Drug,Dose-Response Relationships, Drug,Drug Dose-Response Relationship,Drug Dose-Response Relationships,Relationship, Drug Dose-Response,Relationships, Drug Dose-Response
D000661 Amphetamine A powerful central nervous system stimulant and sympathomimetic. Amphetamine has multiple mechanisms of action including blocking uptake of adrenergics and dopamine, stimulation of release of monamines, and inhibiting monoamine oxidase. Amphetamine is also a drug of abuse and a psychotomimetic. The l- and the d,l-forms are included here. The l-form has less central nervous system activity but stronger cardiovascular effects. The d-form is DEXTROAMPHETAMINE. Desoxynorephedrin,Levoamphetamine,Phenopromin,l-Amphetamine,Amfetamine,Amphetamine Sulfate,Amphetamine Sulfate (2:1),Centramina,Fenamine,Mydrial,Phenamine,Thyramine,levo-Amphetamine,Sulfate, Amphetamine,l Amphetamine,levo Amphetamine
D000818 Animals Unicellular or multicellular, heterotrophic organisms, that have sensation and the power of voluntary movement. Under the older five kingdom paradigm, Animalia was one of the kingdoms. Under the modern three domain model, Animalia represents one of the many groups in the domain EUKARYOTA. Animal,Metazoa,Animalia
D017207 Rats, Sprague-Dawley A strain of albino rat used widely for experimental purposes because of its calmness and ease of handling. It was developed by the Sprague-Dawley Animal Company. Holtzman Rat,Rats, Holtzman,Sprague-Dawley Rat,Rats, Sprague Dawley,Holtzman Rats,Rat, Holtzman,Rat, Sprague-Dawley,Sprague Dawley Rat,Sprague Dawley Rats,Sprague-Dawley Rats
D051381 Rats The common name for the genus Rattus. Rattus,Rats, Laboratory,Rats, Norway,Rattus norvegicus,Laboratory Rat,Laboratory Rats,Norway Rat,Norway Rats,Rat,Rat, Laboratory,Rat, Norway,norvegicus, Rattus

Related Publications

J R Stadler, and W F Caul, and R J Barrett
November 1959, Journal of experimental psychology,
J R Stadler, and W F Caul, and R J Barrett
March 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior,
J R Stadler, and W F Caul, and R J Barrett
July 1962, Journal of experimental psychology,
J R Stadler, and W F Caul, and R J Barrett
April 1960, Journal of experimental psychology,
J R Stadler, and W F Caul, and R J Barrett
October 1999, Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior,
J R Stadler, and W F Caul, and R J Barrett
August 1959, Journal of experimental psychology,
J R Stadler, and W F Caul, and R J Barrett
November 1964, Journal of experimental psychology,
J R Stadler, and W F Caul, and R J Barrett
May 1984, Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior,
J R Stadler, and W F Caul, and R J Barrett
July 1996, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics,
Copied contents to your clipboard!