Relative roles of microdamage and microfracture in the mechanical behavior of trabecular bone. 2001

O C Yeh, and T M Keaveny
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley 94720-1720, USA. oyeh@me.berkeley.edu

Compared to trabecular microfracture, the biomechanical consequences of the morphologically more subtle trabecular microdamage are unclear but potentially important because of its higher incidence. A generic three-dimensional finite element model of the trabecular bone microstructure was used to investigate the relative biomechanical roles of these damage categories on reloading elastic modulus after simulated overloads to various strain levels. Microfractures of individual trabeculae were modeled using a maximum fracture strain criterion, for three values of fracture strain (2%, 8%, and 35%). Microdamage within the trabeculae was modeled using a strain-based modulus reduction rule based on cortical bone behavior. When combining the effects of both microdamage and microfracture, the model predicted reductions in apparent modulus upon reloading of over 60% at an applied apparent strain of 2%, in excellent agreement with previously reported experimental data. According to the model, up to 80% of the trabeculae developed microdamage at 2% apparent strain, and between 2% and 10% of the trabeculae were fractured, depending on which fracture strain was assumed. If microdamage could not occur but microfracture could, good agreement with the experimental data only resulted if the trabecular hard tissue had a fracture strain of 2%. However, a high number of fractures (10% of the trabeculae) would need to occur for this case, and this has not been observed in published damage morphology studies. We conclude therefore that if the damage behavior of trabecular hard tissue is similar to that of cortical bone, then extensive microdamage is primarily responsible for the large loss in apparent mechanical properties that can occur with overloading of trabecular bone.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D001842 Bone and Bones A specialized CONNECTIVE TISSUE that is the main constituent of the SKELETON. The principal cellular component of bone is comprised of OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOCYTES; and OSTEOCLASTS, while FIBRILLAR COLLAGENS and hydroxyapatite crystals form the BONE MATRIX. Bone Tissue,Bone and Bone,Bone,Bones,Bones and Bone,Bones and Bone Tissue,Bony Apophyses,Bony Apophysis,Condyle,Apophyses, Bony,Apophysis, Bony,Bone Tissues,Condyles,Tissue, Bone,Tissues, Bone
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D001696 Biomechanical Phenomena The properties, processes, and behavior of biological systems under the action of mechanical forces. Biomechanics,Kinematics,Biomechanic Phenomena,Mechanobiological Phenomena,Biomechanic,Biomechanic Phenomenas,Phenomena, Biomechanic,Phenomena, Biomechanical,Phenomena, Mechanobiological,Phenomenas, Biomechanic
D013314 Stress, Mechanical A purely physical condition which exists within any material because of strain or deformation by external forces or by non-uniform thermal expansion; expressed quantitatively in units of force per unit area. Mechanical Stress,Mechanical Stresses,Stresses, Mechanical
D050723 Fractures, Bone Breaks in bones. Bone Fractures,Broken Bones,Spiral Fractures,Torsion Fractures,Bone Fracture,Bone, Broken,Bones, Broken,Broken Bone,Fracture, Bone,Fracture, Spiral,Fracture, Torsion,Fractures, Spiral,Fractures, Torsion,Spiral Fracture,Torsion Fracture

Related Publications

O C Yeh, and T M Keaveny
October 2016, Journal of biomechanics,
O C Yeh, and T M Keaveny
May 2009, Clinical calcium,
O C Yeh, and T M Keaveny
December 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering,
O C Yeh, and T M Keaveny
November 1994, Journal of biomechanics,
O C Yeh, and T M Keaveny
April 2007, Bone,
O C Yeh, and T M Keaveny
January 2013, PloS one,
O C Yeh, and T M Keaveny
February 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering,
Copied contents to your clipboard!