[Positron emission tomography for the preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma]. 2002

Th Junginger, and W Kneist, and M Schreckenberger, and C Menzel, and K Oberholzer, and P Bartenstein
Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein- und Abdominalchirurgie, Klinikum der Johannes Gutenburg-Universität, Mainz. sekretariat@ach.klinik.uni-mainz.de

OBJECTIVE Exact preoperative staging is a prerequisite for the indication as well as the choice of the appropriate operative technique for patients with esophageal carcinoma. In this prospective study we assessed whether positron emission tomography (PET) with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) increases the accuracy of staging compared to standard computer tomography (CT) and leads to a different therapeutic approach. METHODS 30 patients (25 men, 5 women, median age 63 years) with histologically identified carcinoma of the esophagus (n =29) and the cardia (n = 1), respectively, were studied. All patients underwent FDG-PET imaging of the neck, chest, and abdomen as well as CT of the chest and abdomen. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated for FDG-PET and CT to evaluate the detection of histologically identified lymph node metastases and distant metastatic disease. RESULTS FDG-PET showed higher specificity whereas the accuracy of the CT proved to be higher not only for the detection of abdominal lymph node metastases (67 % vs. 46 %), but also for lymph node metastases of the thorax (71 % vs. 50 %). Furthermore, the accuracy of the CT for the detection of blood-bone and lymphatic distant metastases was also higher than that of FDG-PET (72 % vs. 68 %). FDG-PET was more specific (100 % vs. 71 %) albeit less sensitive than CT-imaging (27 % vs. 73 %). CONCLUSIONS In our study, FDG-PET did not increase the accuracy of standard staging (CT) in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus. Therefore, no new consequences resulted for the operative indication as well as therapeutic procedure. Due to the high costs involved with PET investigation, this form of staging is momentarily indicated mainly for use in clinical studies, and in cases where CT does not offer unequivocal results. Increase in sensitivity of the already advantageous whole-body FDG-PET imaging by means of tumor-affinitive radiopharmaceuticals as well as optimized apparatus resolution could lead to new indications for this staging procedure.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008207 Lymphatic Metastasis Transfer of a neoplasm from its primary site to lymph nodes or to distant parts of the body by way of the lymphatic system. Lymph Node Metastasis,Lymph Node Metastases,Lymphatic Metastases,Metastasis, Lymph Node
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D009367 Neoplasm Staging Methods which attempt to express in replicable terms the extent of the neoplasm in the patient. Cancer Staging,Staging, Neoplasm,Tumor Staging,TNM Classification,TNM Staging,TNM Staging System,Classification, TNM,Classifications, TNM,Staging System, TNM,Staging Systems, TNM,Staging, Cancer,Staging, TNM,Staging, Tumor,System, TNM Staging,Systems, TNM Staging,TNM Classifications,TNM Staging Systems
D011446 Prospective Studies Observation of a population for a sufficient number of persons over a sufficient number of years to generate incidence or mortality rates subsequent to the selection of the study group. Prospective Study,Studies, Prospective,Study, Prospective
D002277 Carcinoma A malignant neoplasm made up of epithelial cells tending to infiltrate the surrounding tissues and give rise to metastases. It is a histological type of neoplasm and not a synonym for "cancer." Carcinoma, Anaplastic,Carcinoma, Spindle-Cell,Carcinoma, Undifferentiated,Carcinomatosis,Epithelial Neoplasms, Malignant,Epithelioma,Epithelial Tumors, Malignant,Malignant Epithelial Neoplasms,Neoplasms, Malignant Epithelial,Anaplastic Carcinoma,Anaplastic Carcinomas,Carcinoma, Spindle Cell,Carcinomas,Carcinomatoses,Epithelial Neoplasm, Malignant,Epithelial Tumor, Malignant,Epitheliomas,Malignant Epithelial Neoplasm,Malignant Epithelial Tumor,Malignant Epithelial Tumors,Neoplasm, Malignant Epithelial,Spindle-Cell Carcinoma,Spindle-Cell Carcinomas,Tumor, Malignant Epithelial,Undifferentiated Carcinoma,Undifferentiated Carcinomas
D004938 Esophageal Neoplasms Tumors or cancer of the ESOPHAGUS. Cancer of Esophagus,Esophageal Cancer,Cancer of the Esophagus,Esophagus Cancer,Esophagus Neoplasm,Neoplasms, Esophageal,Cancer, Esophageal,Cancer, Esophagus,Cancers, Esophageal,Cancers, Esophagus,Esophageal Cancers,Esophageal Neoplasm,Esophagus Cancers,Esophagus Neoplasms,Neoplasm, Esophageal,Neoplasm, Esophagus,Neoplasms, Esophagus
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D012680 Sensitivity and Specificity Binary classification measures to assess test results. Sensitivity or recall rate is the proportion of true positives. Specificity is the probability of correctly determining the absence of a condition. (From Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) Specificity,Sensitivity,Specificity and Sensitivity

Related Publications

Th Junginger, and W Kneist, and M Schreckenberger, and C Menzel, and K Oberholzer, and P Bartenstein
February 1994, Diseases of the colon and rectum,
Th Junginger, and W Kneist, and M Schreckenberger, and C Menzel, and K Oberholzer, and P Bartenstein
January 2006, Rays,
Th Junginger, and W Kneist, and M Schreckenberger, and C Menzel, and K Oberholzer, and P Bartenstein
September 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology,
Th Junginger, and W Kneist, and M Schreckenberger, and C Menzel, and K Oberholzer, and P Bartenstein
September 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology,
Th Junginger, and W Kneist, and M Schreckenberger, and C Menzel, and K Oberholzer, and P Bartenstein
September 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery,
Th Junginger, and W Kneist, and M Schreckenberger, and C Menzel, and K Oberholzer, and P Bartenstein
September 2002, Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960),
Th Junginger, and W Kneist, and M Schreckenberger, and C Menzel, and K Oberholzer, and P Bartenstein
March 2000, Clinical nuclear medicine,
Th Junginger, and W Kneist, and M Schreckenberger, and C Menzel, and K Oberholzer, and P Bartenstein
February 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
Th Junginger, and W Kneist, and M Schreckenberger, and C Menzel, and K Oberholzer, and P Bartenstein
June 2016, Journal of gastrointestinal oncology,
Th Junginger, and W Kneist, and M Schreckenberger, and C Menzel, and K Oberholzer, and P Bartenstein
September 2006, The Journal of urology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!