Digital subtraction radiography for assessment of simulated root resorption cavities. Performance of conventional and reverse contrast modes. 1992

H Hintze, and A Wenzel, and F M Andreasen, and I Swerin
Institute of Oral Medicine and Diagnosis, Royal Dental College Aarhus.

A previous study of the sensitivity and accuracy of a standardized radiographic technique for the disclosure of root cavities in a cadaver material indicated that it was not possible to perceive small artificial "resorption" cavities. Using the same material, the aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the use of subtraction radiography would improve the detection of root cavities. In an autopsy material of five mandibular blocks each containing two premolars, small, medium, and large cavities were drilled in the cervical, middle, and apical thirds of the proximal and oral root surfaces. Each jaw block was radiographed before (B) and after (A) cavity preparation with three different exposure times resulting in light, medium, and dark film densities. The radiographs were digitized. Digital subtraction was performed between the A- and B images of varying densities by a computer program developed for dental subtraction radiography. Conventional and reverse contrast modes of the subtraction image were assessed independently by four observers. The results showed small inter- and intraobserver differences in diagnostic accuracy for assessment of total number of root cavities. Original film density did not influence the diagnostic performance in the resulting subtraction image. Contrast mode in the subtraction image influenced diagnostic performance as the majority of observers did best with the reverse contrast mode (p < 0.05). Some of the small root cavities were disclosed by the subtraction technique, but overall accuracy was not increased compared to conventional radiography.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D011856 Radiographic Image Enhancement Improvement in the quality of an x-ray image by use of an intensifying screen, tube, or filter and by optimum exposure techniques. Digital processing methods are often employed. Digital Radiography,Image Enhancement, Radiographic,Radiography, Digital,Enhancement, Radiographic Image,Enhancements, Radiographic Image,Image Enhancements, Radiographic,Radiographic Image Enhancements
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D012391 Root Resorption Resorption in which cementum or dentin is lost from the root of a tooth owing to cementoclastic or osteoclastic activity in conditions such as trauma of occlusion or neoplasms. (Dorland, 27th ed) Resorption, Root,Resorptions, Root,Root Resorptions
D012680 Sensitivity and Specificity Binary classification measures to assess test results. Sensitivity or recall rate is the proportion of true positives. Specificity is the probability of correctly determining the absence of a condition. (From Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) Specificity,Sensitivity,Specificity and Sensitivity
D013382 Subtraction Technique Combination or superimposition of two images for demonstrating differences between them (e.g., radiograph with contrast vs. one without, radionuclide images using different radionuclides, radiograph vs. radionuclide image) and in the preparation of audiovisual materials (e.g., offsetting identical images, coloring of vessels in angiograms). Subtraction Technic,Subtraction Technics,Subtraction Techniques,Technic, Subtraction,Technics, Subtraction,Technique, Subtraction,Techniques, Subtraction
D015203 Reproducibility of Results The statistical reproducibility of measurements (often in a clinical context), including the testing of instrumentation or techniques to obtain reproducible results. The concept includes reproducibility of physiological measurements, which may be used to develop rules to assess probability or prognosis, or response to a stimulus; reproducibility of occurrence of a condition; and reproducibility of experimental results. Reliability and Validity,Reliability of Result,Reproducibility Of Result,Reproducibility of Finding,Validity of Result,Validity of Results,Face Validity,Reliability (Epidemiology),Reliability of Results,Reproducibility of Findings,Test-Retest Reliability,Validity (Epidemiology),Finding Reproducibilities,Finding Reproducibility,Of Result, Reproducibility,Of Results, Reproducibility,Reliabilities, Test-Retest,Reliability, Test-Retest,Result Reliabilities,Result Reliability,Result Validities,Result Validity,Result, Reproducibility Of,Results, Reproducibility Of,Test Retest Reliability,Validity and Reliability,Validity, Face

Related Publications

H Hintze, and A Wenzel, and F M Andreasen, and I Swerin
October 2011, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology,
H Hintze, and A Wenzel, and F M Andreasen, and I Swerin
July 1998, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics,
H Hintze, and A Wenzel, and F M Andreasen, and I Swerin
June 1992, Journal of endodontics,
H Hintze, and A Wenzel, and F M Andreasen, and I Swerin
February 1987, Endodontics & dental traumatology,
H Hintze, and A Wenzel, and F M Andreasen, and I Swerin
March 2011, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics,
H Hintze, and A Wenzel, and F M Andreasen, and I Swerin
September 2001, Dento maxillo facial radiology,
H Hintze, and A Wenzel, and F M Andreasen, and I Swerin
March 2001, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics,
H Hintze, and A Wenzel, and F M Andreasen, and I Swerin
January 2014, Iranian endodontic journal,
H Hintze, and A Wenzel, and F M Andreasen, and I Swerin
June 1998, Endodontics & dental traumatology,
H Hintze, and A Wenzel, and F M Andreasen, and I Swerin
July 1988, Journal of periodontal research,
Copied contents to your clipboard!