Using molecular dynamics simulations, we compare the solvation of uranyl and strontium nitrates and uranyl chlorides in two room-temperature ionic liquids (ILs): [BMI][PF(6)] based on 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium(+),PF(6)(-) and [EMI][TCA] based on 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium(+),AlCl(4)(-). Both dissociated M(2+),2NO(3)(-) and associated M(NO(3))(2) states of the salts are considered for the two cations, as well as the UO(2)Cl(2) and UO(2)Cl(4)(2)(-) uranyl complexes. In a [BMI][PF(6)] solution, the "naked" UO(2)(2+) and Sr(2+) ions are surrounded by 5.8 and 10.1 F atoms, respectively. The first-shell PF(6)(-) anions rotate markedly during the dynamics and are coordinated, on the average, monodentate to UO(2)(2+) and bidentate to Sr(2+). In an [EMI][TCA] solution, UO(2)(2+) and Sr(2+) coordinate 5.0 and 7.4 Cl atoms of AlCl(4)(-), respectively, which display more restricted motions. Four Cl atoms sit on a least motion pathway of transfer to uranyl, to form the UO(2)Cl(4)(2)(-) complex. The free NO(3)(-) anions and the UO(2)Cl(4)(2)(-) complex are surrounded by imidazolium(+) cations ( approximately 4 and 6-9, respectively). The first shell of the M(NO(3))(2) and UO(2)Cl(2) neutral complexes is mostly completed by the anionic components of the IL, with different contributions depending on the solvent, the M(2+) cation, and its counterions. Insights into energy components of solvation are given for the different systems.