Conscious cats were used to examine the effectiveness of the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist against the fever induced by interleukin-1 and endotoxin. Although inactive by itself, the antagonist (three 1-micrograms bolus injections at 10-min intervals), injected into the third ventricle, attenuated the febrile response to a subsequent intracerebroventricular bolus of interleukin-1. The rise in prostaglandin E2 levels in cerebrospinal fluid, which is a characteristic feature of fever, was curtailed as well. The interleukin-1 antagonist had little or no inhibitory effect on the response to an intracerebroventricular bolus of endotoxin, even though a higher dose was employed (2-micrograms bolus injections given three times at 10-min intervals and six times at 30-min intervals, respectively, before and after endotoxin administration). At either dosage, the intracerebroventricular antagonist was completely ineffective against an intravenous bolus injection of interleukin-1 or endotoxin and both fever and prostaglandin E2 elevation developed unabated. We conclude that brain receptors mediating the pyrogenic action of centrally injected interleukin-1 are susceptible to the antagonist. The same receptors, however, are seemingly not activated by systemic pyrogens. Our findings are consistent with the concept of circulating interleukin-1 acting outside the blood-brain barrier in the normal sequence of fever.