OBJECTIVE To study the potential application of the cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) in gynecological laparoscopic surgery using a rabbit animal model. METHODS Twenty-six rabbits were prospectively randomized into two groups. Laparoscopically directed standard injuries were made on the randomly assigned horn and sidewall in all animals with the CUSA. Contralateral injuries were made with a contact neodymium-yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser in group 1 and with bipolar cautery in group 2. Adhesion and inflammation scores were assessed for two animals in each group at 24, 48, and 72 hours, and seven animals in each group at 14 days. METHODS University animal research facility. METHODS Adhesion and inflammation scores were compared between animals in the CUSA versus Nd:YAG study and the CUSA versus bipolar cautery at 14 days. RESULTS No significant difference in uterine or sidewall adhesion scores was noted between the CUSA versus Nd:YAG or the CUSA versus bipolar cautery. Bipolar cautery produced significantly less inflammation on the uterine horn compared with the CUSA (3.0 +/- 0.2 versus 5.3 +/- 0.7, P = 0.0001), but no difference in sidewall inflammation was noted between the CUSA compared with bipolar cautery. No difference in inflammation was observed between the CUSA and the Nd:YAG laser. CONCLUSIONS The bipolar cautery appears to be preferable to the CUSA for coagulation of uterine lesions, although dissection of the uterus is not possible with bipolar cautery. The CUSA and the Nd:YAG appear to be comparable for uterine horn dissection. Because the CUSA causes similar adhesion formation and tissue inflammation at the sidewall when compared with the Nd:YAG laser and bipolar cautery and may be less likely to damage blood vessels, ureters, or other collagen-rich tissues, the CUSA may represent a promising new surgical tool for laparoscopically directed peritoneal dissection.