Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality. 1992

P A Newcomb, and R G Norfleet, and B E Storer, and T S Surawicz, and P M Marcus
University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison 53706.

BACKGROUND Sigmoidoscopy may reduce colorectal cancer mortality by identifying both cancers and precursor lesions (including polyps) for treatment; however, evidence regarding the efficacy of this technique as a screening procedure is extremely limited. OBJECTIVE In the absence of data from randomized controlled trials, we performed a retrospective case-control study to determine if sigmoidoscopy screening is associated with a reduction in colorectal cancer mortality. METHODS The medical records of 66 members of the Greater Marshfield Community Health Plan (GMCHP) who died of large-bowel cancer from 1979 to 1988 were reviewed for history of screening for colorectal cancer (case subjects). For comparison, the records of 196 GMCHP members of similar gender, age, and enrollment duration were randomly selected for review (control subjects). RESULTS History of screening sigmoidoscopy was much less common among case subjects (10%) than among control subjects (30%). Risk for death from colorectal cancer was reduced among individuals having had a single examination by screening sigmoidoscopy (odds ratio = 0.21; 95% confidence interval = 0.08-0.52), compared with the risk for those who never had one. The reduction in risk appeared to be limited to tumors in the rectum and distal colon. Neither fecal occult blood testing nor digital rectal examination was associated with a reduction in colorectal cancer mortality. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that screening sigmoidoscopy can substantially reduce mortality from cancers of the rectum and distal colon.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008403 Mass Screening Organized periodic procedures performed on large groups of people for the purpose of detecting disease. Screening,Mass Screenings,Screening, Mass,Screenings,Screenings, Mass
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D005069 Evaluation Studies as Topic Works about studies that determine the effectiveness or value of processes, personnel, and equipment, or the material on conducting such studies. Critique,Evaluation Indexes,Evaluation Methodology,Evaluation Report,Evaluation Research,Methodology, Evaluation,Pre-Post Tests,Qualitative Evaluation,Quantitative Evaluation,Theoretical Effectiveness,Use-Effectiveness,Critiques,Effectiveness, Theoretical,Evaluation Methodologies,Evaluation Reports,Evaluation, Qualitative,Evaluation, Quantitative,Evaluations, Qualitative,Evaluations, Quantitative,Indexes, Evaluation,Methodologies, Evaluation,Pre Post Tests,Pre-Post Test,Qualitative Evaluations,Quantitative Evaluations,Report, Evaluation,Reports, Evaluation,Research, Evaluation,Test, Pre-Post,Tests, Pre-Post,Use Effectiveness
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000368 Aged A person 65 years of age or older. For a person older than 79 years, AGED, 80 AND OVER is available. Elderly
D000369 Aged, 80 and over Persons 80 years of age and older. Oldest Old
D012189 Retrospective Studies Studies used to test etiologic hypotheses in which inferences about an exposure to putative causal factors are derived from data relating to characteristics of persons under study or to events or experiences in their past. The essential feature is that some of the persons under study have the disease or outcome of interest and their characteristics are compared with those of unaffected persons. Retrospective Study,Studies, Retrospective,Study, Retrospective
D012307 Risk Factors An aspect of personal behavior or lifestyle, environmental exposure, inborn or inherited characteristic, which, based on epidemiological evidence, is known to be associated with a health-related condition considered important to prevent. Health Correlates,Risk Factor Scores,Risk Scores,Social Risk Factors,Population at Risk,Populations at Risk,Correlates, Health,Factor, Risk,Factor, Social Risk,Factors, Social Risk,Risk Factor,Risk Factor Score,Risk Factor, Social,Risk Factors, Social,Risk Score,Score, Risk,Score, Risk Factor,Social Risk Factor

Related Publications

P A Newcomb, and R G Norfleet, and B E Storer, and T S Surawicz, and P M Marcus
January 1990, Journal of general internal medicine,
P A Newcomb, and R G Norfleet, and B E Storer, and T S Surawicz, and P M Marcus
June 2012, The New England journal of medicine,
P A Newcomb, and R G Norfleet, and B E Storer, and T S Surawicz, and P M Marcus
December 2014, Annals of internal medicine,
P A Newcomb, and R G Norfleet, and B E Storer, and T S Surawicz, and P M Marcus
August 1992, The New England journal of medicine,
P A Newcomb, and R G Norfleet, and B E Storer, and T S Surawicz, and P M Marcus
February 2013, Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie,
P A Newcomb, and R G Norfleet, and B E Storer, and T S Surawicz, and P M Marcus
October 2003, Lancet (London, England),
P A Newcomb, and R G Norfleet, and B E Storer, and T S Surawicz, and P M Marcus
June 2018, Annals of internal medicine,
P A Newcomb, and R G Norfleet, and B E Storer, and T S Surawicz, and P M Marcus
March 1993, Lancet (London, England),
P A Newcomb, and R G Norfleet, and B E Storer, and T S Surawicz, and P M Marcus
September 2004, The Medical journal of Australia,
P A Newcomb, and R G Norfleet, and B E Storer, and T S Surawicz, and P M Marcus
March 1992, The New England journal of medicine,
Copied contents to your clipboard!