[Early maternal and neonatal morbidity after spontaneous and surgically-assisted vaginal delivery]. 2003

T Kilián, and M Kudela, and M Procházka, and M Vĕtr, and J Hálek
Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika LF UP a FN Olomouc.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the differences in early maternal and neonatal morbidity after spontaneous delivery, forceps delivery and vacuum-extraction. METHODS Retrospective clinical study. METHODS Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Palacký University, Olomouc. METHODS The database of 8196 deliveries at our department in the time period from January 1995 till September 2000 revealed 183 of forceps deliveries and 217 of vacuum-extractions. The control group included 200 randomly selected parturients with spontaneous vaginal delivery. The early maternal morbidity was evaluated according to the following parameters: perineal tears of the IIIrd + IVth degree, duration of hospitalization, average blood loss, the need of analgetics, dehiscence of episiotomy requiring resuture, febrilies and administration of antibiotics. The early neonatal morbidity evaluation was based on the incidence of cephalhematomas, the incidence of hyperbilirubinaemia, duration of hospitalization, signs of fetal hypoxia (pH, Apgar score), gestational age, birthweight and the presence of intracranial and retinal bleeding. The statistical significance of the differences in the frequency of the above parameters was evaluated. RESULTS Spontaneous deliveries were associated with lower maternal morbidity according to the most of studied parameters. Vacuum-extraction had a lower frequency of maternal postpartum complications compared to forceps deliveries. Statistically valid differences were however found only at perineal tears of the IIIrd + IVth degree and at administration of analgetic and antibiotics. The use of vacuum-extraction seems to be connected with a higher risk of cephalhematomas (p = 0.0051) and longer duration of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS From the point of view of early maternal morbidity the assisted vaginal delivery by vacuumextraction gives better results than by forceps. However vacuum-extraction increases the risk of cephalhematomas at newborn.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007231 Infant, Newborn An infant during the first 28 days after birth. Neonate,Newborns,Infants, Newborn,Neonates,Newborn,Newborn Infant,Newborn Infants
D009772 Obstetrical Forceps Surgical instrument designed to extract the newborn by the head from the maternal passages without injury to it or the mother. Obstetric Forceps,Forcep, Obstetric,Forcep, Obstetrical,Forceps, Obstetric,Forceps, Obstetrical,Obstetric Forcep,Obstetrical Forcep
D011247 Pregnancy The status during which female mammals carry their developing young (EMBRYOS or FETUSES) in utero before birth, beginning from FERTILIZATION to BIRTH. Gestation,Pregnancies
D005113 Extraction, Obstetrical Extraction of the fetus by means of obstetrical instruments. Extraction, Obstetric,Extractions, Obstetric,Extractions, Obstetrical,Obstetric Extraction,Obstetric Extractions,Obstetrical Extraction,Obstetrical Extractions
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D014620 Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical Removal of the fetus from the uterus or vagina at or near the end of pregnancy with a metal traction cup that is attached to the fetus' head. Negative pressure is applied and traction is made on a chain passed through the suction tube. (From Stedman, 26th ed & Dorland, 28th ed) Delivery, Vacuum Extraction,Vacuum Extraction, Obstetric,Deliveries, Vacuum Extraction,Extraction Deliveries, Vacuum,Extraction Delivery, Vacuum,Extraction, Obstetric Vacuum,Extraction, Obstetrical Vacuum,Extractions, Obstetric Vacuum,Extractions, Obstetrical Vacuum,Obstetric Vacuum Extraction,Obstetric Vacuum Extractions,Obstetrical Vacuum Extraction,Obstetrical Vacuum Extractions,Vacuum Extraction Deliveries,Vacuum Extraction Delivery,Vacuum Extractions, Obstetric,Vacuum Extractions, Obstetrical

Related Publications

T Kilián, and M Kudela, and M Procházka, and M Vĕtr, and J Hálek
May 2022, Obstetrics and gynecology,
T Kilián, and M Kudela, and M Procházka, and M Vĕtr, and J Hálek
May 2021, American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM,
T Kilián, and M Kudela, and M Procházka, and M Vĕtr, and J Hálek
October 2005, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology,
T Kilián, and M Kudela, and M Procházka, and M Vĕtr, and J Hálek
December 2008, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction,
T Kilián, and M Kudela, and M Procházka, and M Vĕtr, and J Hálek
April 2022, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology,
T Kilián, and M Kudela, and M Procházka, and M Vĕtr, and J Hálek
September 2015, Obstetrics and gynecology,
T Kilián, and M Kudela, and M Procházka, and M Vĕtr, and J Hálek
December 2004, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians,
T Kilián, and M Kudela, and M Procházka, and M Vĕtr, and J Hálek
February 2012, The American journal of nursing,
T Kilián, and M Kudela, and M Procházka, and M Vĕtr, and J Hálek
January 2014, The Pan African medical journal,
T Kilián, and M Kudela, and M Procházka, and M Vĕtr, and J Hálek
October 2006, Seminars in perinatology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!