There has been a rising current of calls for a moratorium on international nutritional research in favor of an investment in intervention programs, per se. The topic of multiple-micronutrient supplementation reviewed at the International Workshop on Multi-Micronutrient Deficiency Control in the Life Cycle (May 30-June 1, 2001) has confirmed once again, however, the intimate interaction between program development and a supporting agenda of applied research. The areas of research required to produce successful intervention programs include biologic availability, safety and efficacy, communications and behavior, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness (efficiency), and food and pharmaceutical technology. Attention to safety and surveillance for unintended adverse effects has acquired new relevance as we analyze the multi-center International Research on Infant Supplementation (IRIS) I studies. All professionals involved in research projects in this area must assure both the quality and reliability of investigations and adhere to the highest principles of ethical conduct of research in human studies. The fundamental principles of research design and hypothesis development, quality assurance, reliability of measurements, and sound and unbiased interpretation of findings apply to all experimental science, and must be guaranteed for this mission. Agencies, academic institutions, and industry alike must work to create a system in which researchers can uphold these standards, and realize at the same time that the area of multi-micronutrient supplementation in developing countries can be a fertile area for training future researchers.