Diagnostic performance of the variant lymphocyte flag of the Abbott Cell-Dyn 4000 haematology analyser. 2004

J J M L Hoffmann, and R M J Hoedemakers
Department of Clinical Laboratories, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. hans.hoffmann@cze.nl

BACKGROUND In addition to differential cell counts, modern haematology analysers generate suspect flags if abnormal cells are detected. Reports on validation of suspect flags are scarce. We have routine experience with the Abbott Cell-Dyn 4000 analyser for over 5 years and have previously demonstrated the utility of the blast flag. Here we report a similar study on the performance of the analyser's Variant Lymphocyte (VL) flag. OBJECTIVE Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the Cell-Dyn 4000 VL flag, as compared with lymphocyte morphology in blood smears. In addition, we investigated the usefulness of the numerical VL flag confidence index as provided by the analyser. METHODS All samples generating a VL flag were reviewed over a 5-month period. We also reviewed smears from patients with known lymphoid disorders, even if the analyser did not flag the sample. Two experienced investigators assessed lymphocyte morphology independently. RESULTS In total, 187 samples were included in the study, of which 183 had a VL flag and four had not. Of the 183 flagged samples, 83 appeared to have abnormal lymphocyte morphology and 100, normal lymphocyte morphology. The sensitivity of the VL flag for detecting abnormal lymphocytes was 0.95 and the positive predictive value was 0.44. Using ROC analysis of the VL flag confidence index, the area under the ROC curve was 0.58 (95% confidence interval 0.50-0.65). CONCLUSIONS The Cell-Dyn VL flag has reasonable sensitivity but a high false-positive rate. In addition, its performance is insufficient for detecting clinically relevant abnormal lymphocytes. As the VL flag appeared to rely mainly on numerical criteria, it has no added value over numerical criteria defined by the laboratory.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007958 Leukocyte Count The number of WHITE BLOOD CELLS per unit volume in venous BLOOD. A differential leukocyte count measures the relative numbers of the different types of white cells. Blood Cell Count, White,Differential Leukocyte Count,Leukocyte Count, Differential,Leukocyte Number,White Blood Cell Count,Count, Differential Leukocyte,Count, Leukocyte,Counts, Differential Leukocyte,Counts, Leukocyte,Differential Leukocyte Counts,Leukocyte Counts,Leukocyte Counts, Differential,Leukocyte Numbers,Number, Leukocyte,Numbers, Leukocyte
D008214 Lymphocytes White blood cells formed in the body's lymphoid tissue. The nucleus is round or ovoid with coarse, irregularly clumped chromatin while the cytoplasm is typically pale blue with azurophilic (if any) granules. Most lymphocytes can be classified as either T or B (with subpopulations of each), or NATURAL KILLER CELLS. Lymphoid Cells,Cell, Lymphoid,Cells, Lymphoid,Lymphocyte,Lymphoid Cell
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D005069 Evaluation Studies as Topic Works about studies that determine the effectiveness or value of processes, personnel, and equipment, or the material on conducting such studies. Critique,Evaluation Indexes,Evaluation Methodology,Evaluation Report,Evaluation Research,Methodology, Evaluation,Pre-Post Tests,Qualitative Evaluation,Quantitative Evaluation,Theoretical Effectiveness,Use-Effectiveness,Critiques,Effectiveness, Theoretical,Evaluation Methodologies,Evaluation Reports,Evaluation, Qualitative,Evaluation, Quantitative,Evaluations, Qualitative,Evaluations, Quantitative,Indexes, Evaluation,Methodologies, Evaluation,Pre Post Tests,Pre-Post Test,Qualitative Evaluations,Quantitative Evaluations,Report, Evaluation,Reports, Evaluation,Research, Evaluation,Test, Pre-Post,Tests, Pre-Post,Use Effectiveness
D006402 Hematologic Diseases Disorders of the blood and blood forming tissues. Blood Diseases,Hematological Diseases,Blood Disease,Disease, Blood,Disease, Hematologic,Disease, Hematological,Diseases, Blood,Diseases, Hematologic,Diseases, Hematological,Hematologic Disease,Hematological Disease
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D001322 Autoanalysis Method of analyzing chemicals using automation. Autoanalyses
D012680 Sensitivity and Specificity Binary classification measures to assess test results. Sensitivity or recall rate is the proportion of true positives. Specificity is the probability of correctly determining the absence of a condition. (From Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) Specificity,Sensitivity,Specificity and Sensitivity
D015203 Reproducibility of Results The statistical reproducibility of measurements (often in a clinical context), including the testing of instrumentation or techniques to obtain reproducible results. The concept includes reproducibility of physiological measurements, which may be used to develop rules to assess probability or prognosis, or response to a stimulus; reproducibility of occurrence of a condition; and reproducibility of experimental results. Reliability and Validity,Reliability of Result,Reproducibility Of Result,Reproducibility of Finding,Validity of Result,Validity of Results,Face Validity,Reliability (Epidemiology),Reliability of Results,Reproducibility of Findings,Test-Retest Reliability,Validity (Epidemiology),Finding Reproducibilities,Finding Reproducibility,Of Result, Reproducibility,Of Results, Reproducibility,Reliabilities, Test-Retest,Reliability, Test-Retest,Result Reliabilities,Result Reliability,Result Validities,Result Validity,Result, Reproducibility Of,Results, Reproducibility Of,Test Retest Reliability,Validity and Reliability,Validity, Face

Related Publications

J J M L Hoffmann, and R M J Hoedemakers
December 2007, International journal of laboratory hematology,
J J M L Hoffmann, and R M J Hoedemakers
January 1994, Nouvelle revue francaise d'hematologie,
J J M L Hoffmann, and R M J Hoedemakers
February 2005, Clinical and laboratory haematology,
J J M L Hoffmann, and R M J Hoedemakers
April 2000, American journal of clinical pathology,
J J M L Hoffmann, and R M J Hoedemakers
April 2009, International journal of laboratory hematology,
J J M L Hoffmann, and R M J Hoedemakers
December 1998, Clinical and laboratory haematology,
J J M L Hoffmann, and R M J Hoedemakers
February 2011, International journal of laboratory hematology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!