Implicit versus explicit learning processes in a probabilistic, continuous fine-motor catching task. 1991

T D Green, and J H Flowers
Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska, USA.

We compared the influences of explicit instruction and uninstructed implicit learning of correlations among visual events, in a fine-motor task. The task required visual tracking of a small "ball" of light and "catching" it by means of joystick manipulation. A general pattern of improvement with practice for instructed and "noninstructed" conditions was found. Additionally, both instructed and noninstructed conditions evidenced use of the predictive relationships among stimulus events. The improvement in overall performance caused by explicit verbal instructions was less than the improvement seen with the implicit learning condition. Further, instructed and noninstructed conditions showed different patterns of joystick activity. These findings suggest a qualitatively different approach to visual information processing and task performance for the instructional conditions

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

T D Green, and J H Flowers
January 2023, Journal of motor behavior,
T D Green, and J H Flowers
February 2002, British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953),
T D Green, and J H Flowers
March 2007, Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.),
T D Green, and J H Flowers
December 2021, Learning & behavior,
T D Green, and J H Flowers
November 2020, Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews,
T D Green, and J H Flowers
October 2006, Perceptual and motor skills,
T D Green, and J H Flowers
January 2006, Gait & posture,
T D Green, and J H Flowers
June 2015, Journal of neurophysiology,
T D Green, and J H Flowers
February 2014, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience,
Copied contents to your clipboard!