Lung function among workers in the soft tissue paper-producing industry. 2004

Thomas Kraus, and Annette Pfahlberg, and Petra Zöbelein, and Olaf Gefeller, and Hans Jürgen Raithel
Institute and Outpatient-Clinic for Occupational Medicine, University Hospital, Aachen University of Technology, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany. thomas.kraus@post.rwth-aachen.de

OBJECTIVE To describe lung function in correlation with information on exposure to dust and fibers in soft tissue paper-producing factories in Germany. METHODS Ambient monitoring was performed for inhalable, respirable dust and fibers in nine soft tissue paper-producing factories. In a study group of 1,047 workers (189 control subjects, 240 workers with moderate exposure, and 618 workers with high exposure), spirometry (FVC, FEV(1)) was performed. Information on occupational history, duration of exposure, workshop within the company, former occupational exposures, and smoking habits were collected. By employing multiple linear regression modeling, the potentially confounding effects of age, sex, body mass index, smoking habits, and factory were incorporated into the analysis of FVC, FEV(1), and FEV(1) in percent of FVC (FEV(1)%FVC). By employing a logistic regression model, odds ratios were calculated for FVC < 80% predicted in different exposure subgroups. RESULTS The mean concentrations for inhalable, respirable, and fibrous dusts were 12.4 mg/m(3), 0.28 mg/m(3), and 420,000 fibers per cubic meter. With relation to cumulative dust and fiber exposure, a decrease of FVC from 105.4% predicted to 96.9% predicted (dust) and 97.1% predicted (fibers) in the subgroup with highest cumulative exposure was observed. For FEV(1), a decrease from 107.3% predicted to 103.0% predicted (dust) and 102.8% predicted (fibers) was found. The parameter estimates show dose-response relationships that are more pronounced for FVC compared to FEV(1). FEV(1)%FVC did not change significantly with increasing cumulative exposure, indicating a restrictive pattern of the findings. CONCLUSIONS Due to high ambient dust concentrations and the observed adverse effects on lung function, a reduction of dust exposure and secondary preventive measures is advised.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007221 Industry Any enterprise centered on the processing, assembly, production, or marketing of a line of products, services, commodities, or merchandise, in a particular field often named after its principal product. Examples include the automobile, fishing, music, publishing, insurance, and textile industries. Tertiary Sector,Industries,Sector, Tertiary,Sectors, Tertiary,Tertiary Sectors
D008171 Lung Diseases Pathological processes involving any part of the LUNG. Pulmonary Diseases,Disease, Pulmonary,Diseases, Pulmonary,Pulmonary Disease,Disease, Lung,Diseases, Lung,Lung Disease
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D009784 Occupational Diseases Diseases caused by factors involved in one's employment. Diseases, Occupational,Occupational Illnesses,Disease, Occupational,Illnesse, Occupational,Illnesses, Occupational,Occupational Disease,Occupational Illnesse
D010209 Paper Thin sheets made from wood pulp and other fibrous substances, used for writing, drawing, printing, image duplication or wrapping. Papers
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D011336 Probability The study of chance processes or the relative frequency characterizing a chance process. Probabilities
D012016 Reference Values The range or frequency distribution of a measurement in a population (of organisms, organs or things) that has not been selected for the presence of disease or abnormality. Normal Range,Normal Values,Reference Ranges,Normal Ranges,Normal Value,Range, Normal,Range, Reference,Ranges, Normal,Ranges, Reference,Reference Range,Reference Value,Value, Normal,Value, Reference,Values, Normal,Values, Reference
D012120 Respiration Disorders Diseases of the respiratory system in general or unspecified or for a specific respiratory disease not available. Disorder, Respiration,Disorders, Respiration,Respiration Disorder

Related Publications

Thomas Kraus, and Annette Pfahlberg, and Petra Zöbelein, and Olaf Gefeller, and Hans Jürgen Raithel
January 2020, International archives of occupational and environmental health,
Thomas Kraus, and Annette Pfahlberg, and Petra Zöbelein, and Olaf Gefeller, and Hans Jürgen Raithel
January 1989, International archives of occupational and environmental health,
Thomas Kraus, and Annette Pfahlberg, and Petra Zöbelein, and Olaf Gefeller, and Hans Jürgen Raithel
November 1988, Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro,
Thomas Kraus, and Annette Pfahlberg, and Petra Zöbelein, and Olaf Gefeller, and Hans Jürgen Raithel
January 1988, American journal of industrial medicine,
Thomas Kraus, and Annette Pfahlberg, and Petra Zöbelein, and Olaf Gefeller, and Hans Jürgen Raithel
January 1988, International archives of occupational and environmental health,
Thomas Kraus, and Annette Pfahlberg, and Petra Zöbelein, and Olaf Gefeller, and Hans Jürgen Raithel
May 1999, The European respiratory journal,
Thomas Kraus, and Annette Pfahlberg, and Petra Zöbelein, and Olaf Gefeller, and Hans Jürgen Raithel
January 1992, Medycyna pracy,
Thomas Kraus, and Annette Pfahlberg, and Petra Zöbelein, and Olaf Gefeller, and Hans Jürgen Raithel
January 1987, Sozial- und Praventivmedizin,
Thomas Kraus, and Annette Pfahlberg, and Petra Zöbelein, and Olaf Gefeller, and Hans Jürgen Raithel
May 2013, Ciencia & saude coletiva,
Thomas Kraus, and Annette Pfahlberg, and Petra Zöbelein, and Olaf Gefeller, and Hans Jürgen Raithel
January 2023, Journal of public health research,
Copied contents to your clipboard!