Early postoperative refractive outcomes of pediatric intraocular lens implantation. 2004

Eedy Mezer, and David S Rootman, and Mohamed Abdolell, and Alex V Levin
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the refractive outcome using 5 intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas to determine which best predicts refraction after pediatric cataract surgery. METHODS The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. METHODS This study comprised a review of the charts of 158 consecutive patients aged 2 to 17 years old who were operated on by 1 of 2 staff surgeons between May 1992 and April 2000. The surgeons performed a total of 206 cataract extractions with primary or secondary IOL implantation. The measured outcome was the actual refraction 2 to 6 months postoperatively versus the target refraction. Two regression formulas (SRK, SRK II) and 3 theoretical formulas (Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, SRK/T) were used to predict refractive outcome based on preoperative axial length, corneal curvature, IOL power, and the IOL A-constant provided by the manufacturer. RESULTS Forty-nine patients (59 IOL implantations) with available data 2 to 6 months after surgery were studied. Also analyzed were data from a subset of 31 patients (34 IOL implantations) with available data 2 to 3 months after surgery. There was poor to moderate agreement between the predicted and actual postoperative refractions using the SRK formula (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.50/0.04 [2- to 3-month follow-up/2- to 6-month follow-up]) and good or fair agreement using the other formulas (ICC from 0.60/0.24 for SRK II to 0.67/0.37 for Hoffer Q). The mean difference between the predicted and actual postoperative refractions with all formulas ranged from 1.06 to 1.22 diopters (D)/1.35 to 1.79 D (median 0.81 to 0.99 D/0.94 to 1.40 D; range 3.03 to 5.57 D/6.75 to 9.21 D). Using Holladay 1 and SRK, 9% to 18%/23% to 39% eyes were more than +/-2.00 D off the target outcome refraction. CONCLUSIONS All 5 IOL power calculation formulas were unsatisfactory in achieving the target refraction. This finding may have implications for predicting long-term outcomes, interpreting previous reports of refractive outcomes, and obtaining preoperative informed consent in a clinical setting.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D011184 Postoperative Period The period following a surgical operation. Period, Postoperative,Periods, Postoperative,Postoperative Periods
D012029 Refraction, Ocular Refraction of LIGHT effected by the media of the EYE. Ocular Refraction,Ocular Refractions,Refractions, Ocular
D002387 Cataract Extraction The removal of a cataractous CRYSTALLINE LENS from the eye. Enzymatic Zonulolysis,Phakectomy,Cataract Extractions,Enzymatic Zonulolyses,Extraction, Cataract,Extractions, Cataract,Phakectomies,Zonulolyses, Enzymatic,Zonulolysis, Enzymatic
D002648 Child A person 6 to 12 years of age. An individual 2 to 5 years old is CHILD, PRESCHOOL. Children
D002675 Child, Preschool A child between the ages of 2 and 5. Children, Preschool,Preschool Child,Preschool Children
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000293 Adolescent A person 13 to 18 years of age. Adolescence,Youth,Adolescents,Adolescents, Female,Adolescents, Male,Teenagers,Teens,Adolescent, Female,Adolescent, Male,Female Adolescent,Female Adolescents,Male Adolescent,Male Adolescents,Teen,Teenager,Youths
D000465 Algorithms A procedure consisting of a sequence of algebraic formulas and/or logical steps to calculate or determine a given task. Algorithm
D012189 Retrospective Studies Studies used to test etiologic hypotheses in which inferences about an exposure to putative causal factors are derived from data relating to characteristics of persons under study or to events or experiences in their past. The essential feature is that some of the persons under study have the disease or outcome of interest and their characteristics are compared with those of unaffected persons. Retrospective Study,Studies, Retrospective,Study, Retrospective
D019591 Pseudophakia Presence of an intraocular lens after cataract extraction.

Related Publications

Eedy Mezer, and David S Rootman, and Mohamed Abdolell, and Alex V Levin
January 2018, Seminars in ophthalmology,
Eedy Mezer, and David S Rootman, and Mohamed Abdolell, and Alex V Levin
August 1999, American journal of ophthalmology,
Eedy Mezer, and David S Rootman, and Mohamed Abdolell, and Alex V Levin
December 1998, American journal of ophthalmology,
Eedy Mezer, and David S Rootman, and Mohamed Abdolell, and Alex V Levin
September 1999, American journal of ophthalmology,
Eedy Mezer, and David S Rootman, and Mohamed Abdolell, and Alex V Levin
March 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery,
Eedy Mezer, and David S Rootman, and Mohamed Abdolell, and Alex V Levin
January 2012, International journal of ophthalmology,
Eedy Mezer, and David S Rootman, and Mohamed Abdolell, and Alex V Levin
May 2015, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery,
Eedy Mezer, and David S Rootman, and Mohamed Abdolell, and Alex V Levin
May 2021, BMC ophthalmology,
Eedy Mezer, and David S Rootman, and Mohamed Abdolell, and Alex V Levin
December 2009, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus,
Eedy Mezer, and David S Rootman, and Mohamed Abdolell, and Alex V Levin
July 2022, Seminars in ophthalmology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!