-transparent.png){kind=logo}
Various flexion axes have been used in the literature to describe knee joint kinematics. This study measured the passive knee kinematics of six cadaveric human knee specimens using two widely accepted flexion axes; transepicondylar axis and the geometric center axis. These two axes were found to form an angle of 4.0 degrees +/- 0.8 degrees. The tibial rotation calculated using the transepicondylar axis was significantly different than the rotation obtained using the geometric center axis for the same knee motion. At 90 degrees of flexion, the tibial rotation obtained using the transepicondylar axis was 4.8 degrees +/- 9.4 degrees whereas the rotation recorded using the geometric center axis at the same flexion angle was 13.8 degrees +/- 10.2 degrees. At 150 degrees of knee flexion, the rotations obtained from the transepicondylar and the geometric center axes were 7.2 degrees +/- 5.7 degrees and 19.9 degrees +/- 6.9 degrees, respectively. The data suggest that a clear definition of the flexion axis is necessary when reporting knee joint kinematics.
E Most, and
J Axe, and
H Rubash, and
G Li
June 1998,
Medical engineering & physics,
E Most, and
J Axe, and
H Rubash, and
G Li
March 2007,
Osteoarthritis and cartilage,
E Most, and
J Axe, and
H Rubash, and
G Li
June 2021,
Gait & posture,
E Most, and
J Axe, and
H Rubash, and
G Li
February 2016,
Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon),
E Most, and
J Axe, and
H Rubash, and
G Li
August 2011,
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine,
E Most, and
J Axe, and
H Rubash, and
G Li
January 2008,
Journal of biomechanics,
E Most, and
J Axe, and
H Rubash, and
G Li
January 1997,
Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering,
E Most, and
J Axe, and
H Rubash, and
G Li
May 1972,
Beitrage zur Orthopadie und Traumatologie,
E Most, and
J Axe, and
H Rubash, and
G Li
December 1996,
Medical engineering & physics,
E Most, and
J Axe, and
H Rubash, and
G Li
June 1969,
The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics,
