Surgery aims to eliminate atrial fibrillation (AF) through direct modification of the arrhythmogenic substratum. The Maze procedure, developed two decades ago, has proven to be clearly effective in restoring sinus rhythm in AF patients with or without associated organic cardiac disorders. Indications for surgery may be tailored to the clinical situation involved. In patients with continuous AF associated with structural heart disease (eg, valvular, congenital or coronary artery disease), the performance of a concomitant AF ablation procedure proven to add minimal morbidity to the operation may be highly beneficial to patient outcome. It is likely, although not entirely proven, that the restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm after mitral valve surgery promotes survival by preventing tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy and stroke. Novel strategies for AF surgery involve the use of alternate energy sources to create the lines of block in the atria and the simplification of the lesion pattern compared with the earlier Cox-Maze procedure. Published clinical data support the contention that left atrial ablation techniques performed concomitantly with valvular and/or coronary artery bypass surgery are likely to result in a 70% to 90% cure rate of AF in patients with preoperatively documented AF. Despite the lack of evidence for long-term outcome benefit, intraoperative pulmonary vein ablation, feasible with minimal morbidity, clearly appears to be an improvement over simply ignoring AF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Left atrial appendectomy appears warranted in patients with chronic persistent AF.