-transparent.png){kind=logo}
OBJECTIVE Animal studies (guinea pig, cat, chinchilla) have shown that activity of the medial olivocochlear efferents can exert noise-protective effects on the cochlea. It is not yet known whether such effects are also existent in humans. Olivocochlear activity can be estimated indirectly by contralateral suppression (CS) of otoacoustic emissions (OAE). METHODS We measured Input/Output functions of distortion products of OAE (DPOAE), with and without contralateral acoustic stimulation by white noise, in 94 normal hearing young male subjects. Seven stimuli with L2 between 20 and 60 dB SPL and L1 = 39 dB + 0.4 L2 ("scissor paradigm") were used at f2 = 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 kHz. The measurement was repeated 2 weeks later. In 83 subjects of the same group, pure tone audiometry was registered before and 6 minutes after shooting exercises to evaluate individual susceptibility to develop a temporary threshold shift (TTS). RESULTS Test-retest repeatability of CS was generally good. CS averaged 0.98 dB SPL (SD 1.19 dB, median 0.56 dB). As expected, CS was greatest at low stimulus levels (median 1.06 dB at L2 = 20 dB, as compared with 0.33 dB at L2 = 60 dB). The smallest average CS was found at 4 kHz, and the greatest CS appeared at 2 kHz. A TTS occurred in 7 of 83 (8.5%) subjects. Statistical analysis did not reveal any correlation between the amount of CS and individual TTS susceptibility. CONCLUSIONS 1) Measurement of CS of DPOAE using an extensive measurement paradigm revealed good test-retest repeatability, confirming the reliability of this audiologic tool. 2) CS of DPOAE does not predict individual susceptibility to mild TTS induced by impulse noise in humans. Possible explanations for the missing association are discussed. Future perspectives include longitudinal studies to further elucidate the association between medial olivocochlear bundle-activity and permanent threshold shift in humans. The goal is to develop a diagnostic tool for the prediction of individual noise vulnerability in humans, thereby preventing noise-induced hearing loss.
W Wagner, and
G Heppelmann, and
M Kuehn, and
M Tisch, and
R Vonthein, and
H-P Zenner
January 1995,
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology,
W Wagner, and
G Heppelmann, and
M Kuehn, and
M Tisch, and
R Vonthein, and
H-P Zenner
October 1981,
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
W Wagner, and
G Heppelmann, and
M Kuehn, and
M Tisch, and
R Vonthein, and
H-P Zenner
December 1970,
Brain research,
W Wagner, and
G Heppelmann, and
M Kuehn, and
M Tisch, and
R Vonthein, and
H-P Zenner
July 1980,
The Journal of auditory research,
W Wagner, and
G Heppelmann, and
M Kuehn, and
M Tisch, and
R Vonthein, and
H-P Zenner
January 1972,
Eye, ear, nose & throat monthly,
W Wagner, and
G Heppelmann, and
M Kuehn, and
M Tisch, and
R Vonthein, and
H-P Zenner
April 1971,
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
W Wagner, and
G Heppelmann, and
M Kuehn, and
M Tisch, and
R Vonthein, and
H-P Zenner
February 1998,
Medicine and science in sports and exercise,
W Wagner, and
G Heppelmann, and
M Kuehn, and
M Tisch, and
R Vonthein, and
H-P Zenner
January 1962,
Acta oto-laryngologica,
W Wagner, and
G Heppelmann, and
M Kuehn, and
M Tisch, and
R Vonthein, and
H-P Zenner
December 1968,
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
W Wagner, and
G Heppelmann, and
M Kuehn, and
M Tisch, and
R Vonthein, and
H-P Zenner
December 2004,
Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences,
