In the assessment of the effects of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, three or four clinical measurements supported by the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and sometimes radiographs, are generally agreed to be correct. Some advocate functional assessments also, or even alternatively. Several studies compared gold, penicillamine, antimalarials, and sulfasalazine either with each other or with placebo, and occasionally with methotrexate. No important differences between the general performance of the four drugs were found. More work was reported on sulfasalazine than on the other three drugs; the data support that it has a place in our armamentarium. Several important contributions concerned strategies of treatment. It is considered that disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs should be used earlier and more aggressively in rheumatoid arthritis. This aspect was perhaps the key note of the 1990 literature on this topic. As part of the new strategies, combination therapy is urged by some rheumatologists, whereas others urge caution on the grounds that we do not yet know enough about the effects of combinations, or by how much the risks of adverse effects are increased in combination.