Ultrasensitive solution-cast quantum dot photodetectors. 2006

Gerasimos Konstantatos, and Ian Howard, and Armin Fischer, and Sjoerd Hoogland, and Jason Clifford, and Ethan Klem, and Larissa Levina, and Edward H Sargent
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, 10 King's College Road, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G4 Canada.

Solution-processed electronic and optoelectronic devices offer low cost, large device area, physical flexibility and convenient materials integration compared to conventional epitaxially grown, lattice-matched, crystalline semiconductor devices. Although the electronic or optoelectronic performance of these solution-processed devices is typically inferior to that of those fabricated by conventional routes, this can be tolerated for some applications in view of the other benefits. Here we report the fabrication of solution-processed infrared photodetectors that are superior in their normalized detectivity (D*, the figure of merit for detector sensitivity) to the best epitaxially grown devices operating at room temperature. We produced the devices in a single solution-processing step, overcoating a prefabricated planar electrode array with an unpatterned layer of PbS colloidal quantum dot nanocrystals. The devices showed large photoconductive gains with responsivities greater than 10(3) A W(-1). The best devices exhibited a normalized detectivity D* of 1.8 x 10(13) jones (1 jones = 1 cm Hz(1/2) W(-1)) at 1.3 microm at room temperature: today's highest performance infrared photodetectors are photovoltaic devices made from epitaxially grown InGaAs that exhibit peak D* in the 10(12) jones range at room temperature, whereas the previous record for D* from a photoconductive detector lies at 10(11) jones. The tailored selection of absorption onset energy through the quantum size effect, combined with deliberate engineering of the sequence of nanoparticle fusing and surface trap functionalization, underlie the superior performance achieved in this readily fabricated family of devices.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Gerasimos Konstantatos, and Ian Howard, and Armin Fischer, and Sjoerd Hoogland, and Jason Clifford, and Ethan Klem, and Larissa Levina, and Edward H Sargent
August 2020, Nano convergence,
Gerasimos Konstantatos, and Ian Howard, and Armin Fischer, and Sjoerd Hoogland, and Jason Clifford, and Ethan Klem, and Larissa Levina, and Edward H Sargent
July 2019, ACS applied materials & interfaces,
Gerasimos Konstantatos, and Ian Howard, and Armin Fischer, and Sjoerd Hoogland, and Jason Clifford, and Ethan Klem, and Larissa Levina, and Edward H Sargent
February 2015, ACS nano,
Gerasimos Konstantatos, and Ian Howard, and Armin Fischer, and Sjoerd Hoogland, and Jason Clifford, and Ethan Klem, and Larissa Levina, and Edward H Sargent
February 2005, Nature materials,
Gerasimos Konstantatos, and Ian Howard, and Armin Fischer, and Sjoerd Hoogland, and Jason Clifford, and Ethan Klem, and Larissa Levina, and Edward H Sargent
November 2019, ACS applied materials & interfaces,
Gerasimos Konstantatos, and Ian Howard, and Armin Fischer, and Sjoerd Hoogland, and Jason Clifford, and Ethan Klem, and Larissa Levina, and Edward H Sargent
July 2012, ACS applied materials & interfaces,
Gerasimos Konstantatos, and Ian Howard, and Armin Fischer, and Sjoerd Hoogland, and Jason Clifford, and Ethan Klem, and Larissa Levina, and Edward H Sargent
July 2014, Scientific reports,
Gerasimos Konstantatos, and Ian Howard, and Armin Fischer, and Sjoerd Hoogland, and Jason Clifford, and Ethan Klem, and Larissa Levina, and Edward H Sargent
April 2016, Nanoscale,
Gerasimos Konstantatos, and Ian Howard, and Armin Fischer, and Sjoerd Hoogland, and Jason Clifford, and Ethan Klem, and Larissa Levina, and Edward H Sargent
October 2015, Nanoscale,
Gerasimos Konstantatos, and Ian Howard, and Armin Fischer, and Sjoerd Hoogland, and Jason Clifford, and Ethan Klem, and Larissa Levina, and Edward H Sargent
January 2016, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!