Significance of antiphospholipid antibodies in lupus nephritis. 2006

Chindarat Natejumnong, and Prajej Ruangkanchanasetr, and Pote Aimpun, and Thanom Supaporn
Division of Nephrology, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

BACKGROUND Some autoantibodies have been associated with lupus nephritis but the role of antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) is controversial. OBJECTIVE The present study was to explore the role of APA by comparing demographic profiles and the presence of anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) and lupus anticoagulant (LA) in systemiclupus erythematosus 1 (SLE) patients with and without nephritis. METHODS The cross-sectional study in a tertiary center was conducted in 77 SLE patients. All patients attended our renal or rheumatology clinics between June 2002 and December 2003. RESULTS Sixty-three (82%) of the 77 SLE patients had nephritis. The prevalence of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) was 10% (8 patients), positive aCL (IgG) was 26% (20 patients) and positive LA was 26% (20 patients). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method was applied to assess the significance of aCL in both nephritis and non-nephritis groups. Area under the ROC curve was 0.538 (95%CI 0.312-0.765), a cutoff value of 20.5 GPL had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 53%. In univariate analysis, neither positivity for anticardiolipin antibody nor lupus anticoagulant was associated with lupus nephritis. Analyzed in only the lupus nephritis group, LA-positive lupus nephritis patients had higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) (133.7 vs 121.9 mmHg, p = 0.005), lower platelet count (209.8 vs 264.4 x 10(3)/microL, p = 0.02) and higher 24-hr urine protein excretion (2.6 vs 1.4 g, p = 0.02) than LA-negative lupus nephritis patients. Serum creatinine was higher in LA-positive lupus nephritis than LA-negative (233.0 vs 94.9 micromol/L), but did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS APA are frequently seen in SLE patients, but not associated with lupus nephritis. However lupus anticoagulant tends to associate with lupus nephritis. Detection of LA in lupus nephritis patients could identify patients who had increased risk to develop bad renal outcomes (elevated SBP and 24-hr urine protein excretion).

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008180 Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic A chronic, relapsing, inflammatory, and often febrile multisystemic disorder of connective tissue, characterized principally by involvement of the skin, joints, kidneys, and serosal membranes. It is of unknown etiology, but is thought to represent a failure of the regulatory mechanisms of the autoimmune system. The disease is marked by a wide range of system dysfunctions, an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and the formation of LE cells in the blood or bone marrow. Libman-Sacks Disease,Lupus Erythematosus Disseminatus,Systemic Lupus Erythematosus,Disease, Libman-Sacks,Libman Sacks Disease
D008181 Lupus Nephritis Glomerulonephritis associated with autoimmune disease SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS. Lupus nephritis is histologically classified into 6 classes: class I - normal glomeruli, class II - pure mesangial alterations, class III - focal segmental glomerulonephritis, class IV - diffuse glomerulonephritis, class V - diffuse membranous glomerulonephritis, and class VI - advanced sclerosing glomerulonephritis (The World Health Organization classification 1982). Glomerulonephritis, Lupus,Lupus Glomerulonephritis,Nephritis, Lupus,Glomerulonephritides, Lupus,Lupus Glomerulonephritides,Lupus Nephritides,Nephritides, Lupus
D008297 Male Males
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D003430 Cross-Sectional Studies Studies in which the presence or absence of disease or other health-related variables are determined in each member of the study population or in a representative sample at one particular time. This contrasts with LONGITUDINAL STUDIES which are followed over a period of time. Disease Frequency Surveys,Prevalence Studies,Analysis, Cross-Sectional,Cross Sectional Analysis,Cross-Sectional Survey,Surveys, Disease Frequency,Analyses, Cross Sectional,Analyses, Cross-Sectional,Analysis, Cross Sectional,Cross Sectional Analyses,Cross Sectional Studies,Cross Sectional Survey,Cross-Sectional Analyses,Cross-Sectional Analysis,Cross-Sectional Study,Cross-Sectional Surveys,Disease Frequency Survey,Prevalence Study,Studies, Cross-Sectional,Studies, Prevalence,Study, Cross-Sectional,Study, Prevalence,Survey, Cross-Sectional,Survey, Disease Frequency,Surveys, Cross-Sectional
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000328 Adult A person having attained full growth or maturity. Adults are of 19 through 44 years of age. For a person between 19 and 24 years of age, YOUNG ADULT is available. Adults
D001323 Autoantibodies Antibodies that react with self-antigens (AUTOANTIGENS) of the organism that produced them. Autoantibody
D012372 ROC Curve A graphic means for assessing the ability of a screening test to discriminate between healthy and diseased persons; may also be used in other studies, e.g., distinguishing stimuli responses as to a faint stimuli or nonstimuli. ROC Analysis,Receiver Operating Characteristic,Analysis, ROC,Analyses, ROC,Characteristic, Receiver Operating,Characteristics, Receiver Operating,Curve, ROC,Curves, ROC,ROC Analyses,ROC Curves,Receiver Operating Characteristics

Related Publications

Chindarat Natejumnong, and Prajej Ruangkanchanasetr, and Pote Aimpun, and Thanom Supaporn
January 2016, PloS one,
Chindarat Natejumnong, and Prajej Ruangkanchanasetr, and Pote Aimpun, and Thanom Supaporn
March 1997, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation,
Chindarat Natejumnong, and Prajej Ruangkanchanasetr, and Pote Aimpun, and Thanom Supaporn
May 1989, Medicina clinica,
Chindarat Natejumnong, and Prajej Ruangkanchanasetr, and Pote Aimpun, and Thanom Supaporn
September 2003, Renal failure,
Chindarat Natejumnong, and Prajej Ruangkanchanasetr, and Pote Aimpun, and Thanom Supaporn
January 2015, International journal of pediatrics & adolescent medicine,
Chindarat Natejumnong, and Prajej Ruangkanchanasetr, and Pote Aimpun, and Thanom Supaporn
April 2004, Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany),
Chindarat Natejumnong, and Prajej Ruangkanchanasetr, and Pote Aimpun, and Thanom Supaporn
January 2009, Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan),
Chindarat Natejumnong, and Prajej Ruangkanchanasetr, and Pote Aimpun, and Thanom Supaporn
May 2020, Clinical rheumatology,
Chindarat Natejumnong, and Prajej Ruangkanchanasetr, and Pote Aimpun, and Thanom Supaporn
February 1989, Zhonghua nei ke za zhi,
Chindarat Natejumnong, and Prajej Ruangkanchanasetr, and Pote Aimpun, and Thanom Supaporn
June 2016, European journal of rheumatology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!