Preschool vision screening by family physicians. 2007

Alex R Kemper, and Sarah J Clark
Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, Division of General Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

To determine the rate of preschool vision screening in family practice. To evaluate attitudes and beliefs about the importance of, and barriers to, preschool vision screening. Mail survey of a national sample of family physicians. The response rate was 35% (237 of 671 eligible respondents). Most (90%) considered preschool vision screening important. The majority (91%) included some component of the eye examination as part of their routine well-child care for preschool-aged children. The likelihood of formal screening increased with age (3 years, 36%; 4 years, 58%; 5 years, 73%; P < .01). Most (88%) used a wall chart to test for visual acuity. Stereoacuity was rarely (7%) tested. Barriers included the perception that children are uncooperative (39%) and that screening is too time-consuming (21%). Fifty-nine percent would only consider using a vision screening test if its false-positive rate was 10% or less. Some (26%) reported that all children should be examined by an optometrist or ophthalmologist prior to school entry, regardless of any screening. The rate of screening by family physicians is similar to that by pediatricians. Providing education regarding optimal vision screening strategies and expected outcomes of screening may be important for improving both the rate and the quality of preschool vision screening. Ophthalmologists may play an important role in this process through the feedback they provide to referring physicians.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D010821 Physicians, Family Those physicians who have completed the education requirements specified by the American Academy of Family Physicians. Family Physician,Family Physicians,Physician, Family
D011159 Population Surveillance Ongoing scrutiny of a population (general population, study population, target population, etc.), generally using methods distinguished by their practicability, uniformity, and frequently their rapidity, rather than by complete accuracy. Surveillance, Population
D002675 Child, Preschool A child between the ages of 2 and 5. Children, Preschool,Preschool Child,Preschool Children
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D012189 Retrospective Studies Studies used to test etiologic hypotheses in which inferences about an exposure to putative causal factors are derived from data relating to characteristics of persons under study or to events or experiences in their past. The essential feature is that some of the persons under study have the disease or outcome of interest and their characteristics are compared with those of unaffected persons. Retrospective Study,Studies, Retrospective,Study, Retrospective
D014786 Vision Disorders Visual impairments limiting one or more of the basic functions of the eye: visual acuity, dark adaptation, color vision, or peripheral vision. These may result from EYE DISEASES; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; VISUAL PATHWAY diseases; OCCIPITAL LOBE diseases; OCULAR MOTILITY DISORDERS; and other conditions (From Newell, Ophthalmology: Principles and Concepts, 7th ed, p132). Hemeralopia,Macropsia,Micropsia,Day Blindness,Metamorphopsia,Vision Disability,Visual Disorders,Visual Impairment,Blindness, Day,Disabilities, Vision,Disability, Vision,Disorder, Visual,Disorders, Visual,Hemeralopias,Impairment, Visual,Impairments, Visual,Macropsias,Metamorphopsias,Micropsias,Vision Disabilities,Vision Disorder,Visual Disorder,Visual Impairments
D015351 Vision Screening Application of tests and examinations to identify visual defects or vision disorders occurring in specific populations, as in school children, the elderly, etc. It is differentiated from VISION TESTS, which are given to evaluate/measure individual visual performance not related to a specific population. Screening, Vision,Screenings, Vision,Vision Screenings

Related Publications

Alex R Kemper, and Sarah J Clark
August 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology,
Alex R Kemper, and Sarah J Clark
May 1968, The Journal of the Arkansas Medical Society,
Alex R Kemper, and Sarah J Clark
January 1997, Health technology assessment (Winchester, England),
Alex R Kemper, and Sarah J Clark
June 1959, American journal of public health and the nation's health,
Alex R Kemper, and Sarah J Clark
March 1991, Archives of disease in childhood,
Alex R Kemper, and Sarah J Clark
May 1997, The British journal of ophthalmology,
Alex R Kemper, and Sarah J Clark
December 1971, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry,
Alex R Kemper, and Sarah J Clark
December 1972, Pediatrics,
Alex R Kemper, and Sarah J Clark
January 1965, The Sight-saving review,
Alex R Kemper, and Sarah J Clark
January 1992, BMJ (Clinical research ed.),
Copied contents to your clipboard!