Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. 2007

Simon W Young, and Salil Pandit, and Jacob T Munro, and Rocco P Pitto
Middlemore Hospital, Orthopaedic Surgery, South Aukland Clinical School, University of Aukland, Auckland, New Zealand. simonwyoung@gmail.com

BACKGROUND The management of periprosthetic fracture following a total hip arthroplasty is difficult, requiring expertise in both trauma and revision surgery. With rising numbers of patients in the population living with hip prostheses in situ, the frequency of these fractures is increasing, and controversy remains over their ideal management. The objective of this study was to review all periprosthetic fractures at a single institution to identify injury and treatment patterns and their associated clinical outcomes. METHODS Fifty-four periprosthetic fractures in 50 patients were reviewed to determine the relative frequency of fracture types, their complication rates and the clinical outcomes. Patient data were obtained through review of the clinical notes and individual patient follow up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Oxford Hip Score and Harris Hip Score. RESULTS The 54 fractures were classified using the Vancouver system, most of which were type B1 (20) or type B2 (10). The mean time to union for all fracture types was 4.6 months. A high non-union rate was seen among fractures fixed operatively. Fifteen per cent of fractures went on to develop loosening following treatment, suggesting an underrecognition at the time of injury. The average Harris Hip Score was 73.1 and Oxford Hip Score 30.3 for all fracture types at a mean follow up of 3.3 years. In the 15 patients treated with revision surgery, the most common complication was dislocation (27%). CONCLUSIONS Treatment of patients with periprosthetic fractures requires recognition of the challenging nature of these injuries, the associated poor prognosis and the high complication rate.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D011183 Postoperative Complications Pathologic processes that affect patients after a surgical procedure. They may or may not be related to the disease for which the surgery was done, and they may or may not be direct results of the surgery. Complication, Postoperative,Complications, Postoperative,Postoperative Complication
D011379 Prognosis A prediction of the probable outcome of a disease based on a individual's condition and the usual course of the disease as seen in similar situations. Prognostic Factor,Prognostic Factors,Factor, Prognostic,Factors, Prognostic,Prognoses
D011475 Prosthesis Failure Malfunction of implantation shunts, valves, etc., and prosthesis loosening, migration, and breaking. Prosthesis Loosening,Prosthesis Durability,Prosthesis Migration,Prosthesis Survival,Durabilities, Prosthesis,Durability, Prosthesis,Failure, Prosthesis,Failures, Prosthesis,Loosening, Prosthesis,Loosenings, Prosthesis,Migration, Prosthesis,Migrations, Prosthesis,Prosthesis Durabilities,Prosthesis Failures,Prosthesis Loosenings,Prosthesis Migrations,Prosthesis Survivals,Survival, Prosthesis,Survivals, Prosthesis
D012086 Reoperation A repeat operation for the same condition in the same patient due to disease progression or recurrence, or as followup to failed previous surgery. Revision, Joint,Revision, Surgical,Surgery, Repeat,Surgical Revision,Repeat Surgery,Revision Surgery,Joint Revision,Revision Surgeries,Surgery, Revision
D005260 Female Females
D005264 Femoral Fractures Fractures of the femur. Femoral Fracture,Fracture, Femoral,Fractures, Femoral
D005500 Follow-Up Studies Studies in which individuals or populations are followed to assess the outcome of exposures, procedures, or effects of a characteristic, e.g., occurrence of disease. Followup Studies,Follow Up Studies,Follow-Up Study,Followup Study,Studies, Follow-Up,Studies, Followup,Study, Follow-Up,Study, Followup
D006617 Hip Dislocation Displacement of the femur bone from its normal position at the HIP JOINT. Hip Displacement,Hip Dysplasia,Dislocation, Hip,Dislocations, Hip,Displacement, Hip,Displacements, Hip,Dysplasia, Hip,Dysplasias, Hip,Hip Dislocations,Hip Displacements,Hip Dysplasias
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man

Related Publications

Simon W Young, and Salil Pandit, and Jacob T Munro, and Rocco P Pitto
January 2016, Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca,
Simon W Young, and Salil Pandit, and Jacob T Munro, and Rocco P Pitto
December 2014, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy,
Simon W Young, and Salil Pandit, and Jacob T Munro, and Rocco P Pitto
July 2019, Injury,
Simon W Young, and Salil Pandit, and Jacob T Munro, and Rocco P Pitto
January 2013, Acta medica (Hradec Kralove),
Simon W Young, and Salil Pandit, and Jacob T Munro, and Rocco P Pitto
June 2024, The Journal of arthroplasty,
Simon W Young, and Salil Pandit, and Jacob T Munro, and Rocco P Pitto
November 2018, Maturitas,
Simon W Young, and Salil Pandit, and Jacob T Munro, and Rocco P Pitto
January 2010, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy,
Simon W Young, and Salil Pandit, and Jacob T Munro, and Rocco P Pitto
October 2021, Arthroplasty (London, England),
Simon W Young, and Salil Pandit, and Jacob T Munro, and Rocco P Pitto
January 2004, Acta chirurgica Iugoslavica,
Simon W Young, and Salil Pandit, and Jacob T Munro, and Rocco P Pitto
September 2017, Acta clinica Croatica,
Copied contents to your clipboard!