-transparent.png){kind=logo}
Three types of anaesthetic waste scavenging systems (active antipollution system, Papworth Block passive system and activated charcoal absorber system) were compared with a non-scavenging control to assess their effectiveness in reducing waste halothane concentrations in a chemical warfare-proof operating theatre. All three systems were found to reduce the level of pollution significantly.
Related Publications
S Yoganathan, and
I G Johnston, and
C J Parnell, and
I T Houghton, and
J Restall
February 1984,
Anaesthesia,
S Yoganathan, and
I G Johnston, and
C J Parnell, and
I T Houghton, and
J Restall
April 1977,
British medical journal,
S Yoganathan, and
I G Johnston, and
C J Parnell, and
I T Houghton, and
J Restall
May 1977,
British medical journal,
S Yoganathan, and
I G Johnston, and
C J Parnell, and
I T Houghton, and
J Restall
June 1977,
British medical journal,
S Yoganathan, and
I G Johnston, and
C J Parnell, and
I T Houghton, and
J Restall
July 1977,
British medical journal,
S Yoganathan, and
I G Johnston, and
C J Parnell, and
I T Houghton, and
J Restall
July 1977,
British medical journal,
S Yoganathan, and
I G Johnston, and
C J Parnell, and
I T Houghton, and
J Restall
October 1989,
The Analyst,
S Yoganathan, and
I G Johnston, and
C J Parnell, and
I T Houghton, and
J Restall
September 1996,
Anaesthesia,
S Yoganathan, and
I G Johnston, and
C J Parnell, and
I T Houghton, and
J Restall
February 1980,
Anaesthesia and intensive care,
S Yoganathan, and
I G Johnston, and
C J Parnell, and
I T Houghton, and
J Restall
October 1989,
The Analyst,
