Complications of pegged and non-pegged hydroxyapatite orbital implants. 2007

Daniel K Fahim, and Bartley R Frueh, and David C Musch, and Christine C Nelson
W.K. Kellogg Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is twofold: to assess the incidence and implications of complications unique to placing a freestanding polycarbonate peg in patients with hydroxyapatite implants and to compare the incidence of complications in these patients with the incidence in patients with non-pegged hydroxyapatite implants. METHODS This is a retrospective clinical case series of 103 patients who underwent hydroxyapatite implant insertion at our institution. The incidence of postoperative complications in patients who underwent freestanding polycarbonate pegging procedures (n = 21) and those who had not (n = 82) were compared. RESULTS One postoperative complication - infection - occurred in a significantly higher percentage of patients in the pegged group (42.9%, 9/21) compared with the non-pegged group (19.5%, 16/82), (p = 0.037). Fifteen of the 21 patients (71.4%) in the pegged group experienced complications unique to freestanding polycarbonate pegging. Overall, 95.2% (20/21) of patients in the pegged group experienced a complication compared with 58.5% (48/82) of patients in the non-pegged group, (p = 0.001). In addition, there was an average of 3.1 (66/21) complications per patient in the pegged group compared with an average of 1.9 (106/82) complications per patient in the non-pegged group (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS Patients who received a freestanding polycarbonate pegged implant had a high risk of experiencing complications unique to pegging, and therefore a significantly higher rate of complications overall when compared with patients whose implant was not pegged. In addition, patients who received a pegged implant had a higher incidence of infection. However, most patients retained their pegs despite complications.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D011076 Polycarboxylate Cement Water-soluble low-molecular-weight polymers of acrylic or methacrylic acid that form solid, insoluble products when mixed with specially prepared ZnO powder. The resulting cement adheres to dental enamel and is also used as a luting agent. Zinc Polycarboxylate Cement,Cement, Polycarboxylate,Cement, Zinc Polycarboxylate,Polycarboxylate Cement, Zinc
D011183 Postoperative Complications Pathologic processes that affect patients after a surgical procedure. They may or may not be related to the disease for which the surgery was done, and they may or may not be direct results of the surgery. Complication, Postoperative,Complications, Postoperative,Postoperative Complication
D002648 Child A person 6 to 12 years of age. An individual 2 to 5 years old is CHILD, PRESCHOOL. Children
D002675 Child, Preschool A child between the ages of 2 and 5. Children, Preschool,Preschool Child,Preschool Children
D005137 Eye, Artificial A ready-made or custom-made prosthesis of glass or plastic shaped and colored to resemble the anterior portion of a normal eye and used for cosmetic reasons. It is attached to the anterior portion of an orbital implant (ORBITAL IMPLANTS) which is placed in the socket of an enucleated or eviscerated eye. (From Dorland, 28th ed) Artificial Eye,Ocular Prosthesis,Artificial Eyes,Eyes, Artificial,Ocular Prostheses,Prostheses, Ocular,Prosthesis, Ocular
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000293 Adolescent A person 13 to 18 years of age. Adolescence,Youth,Adolescents,Adolescents, Female,Adolescents, Male,Teenagers,Teens,Adolescent, Female,Adolescent, Male,Female Adolescent,Female Adolescents,Male Adolescent,Male Adolescents,Teen,Teenager,Youths

Related Publications

Daniel K Fahim, and Bartley R Frueh, and David C Musch, and Christine C Nelson
September 1997, Ophthalmology,
Daniel K Fahim, and Bartley R Frueh, and David C Musch, and Christine C Nelson
March 1999, Ophthalmology,
Daniel K Fahim, and Bartley R Frueh, and David C Musch, and Christine C Nelson
November 2008, Ophthalmology,
Daniel K Fahim, and Bartley R Frueh, and David C Musch, and Christine C Nelson
January 2012, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery,
Daniel K Fahim, and Bartley R Frueh, and David C Musch, and Christine C Nelson
April 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology,
Daniel K Fahim, and Bartley R Frueh, and David C Musch, and Christine C Nelson
July 1997, Ophthalmology,
Daniel K Fahim, and Bartley R Frueh, and David C Musch, and Christine C Nelson
April 1996, Neuroradiology,
Daniel K Fahim, and Bartley R Frueh, and David C Musch, and Christine C Nelson
April 1992, American journal of ophthalmology,
Daniel K Fahim, and Bartley R Frueh, and David C Musch, and Christine C Nelson
March 2003, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery,
Daniel K Fahim, and Bartley R Frueh, and David C Musch, and Christine C Nelson
December 1997, Ophthalmology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!