Understanding of facial expressions of emotion by children with intellectual disabilities of differing aetiology. 2007

J G Wishart, and K R Cebula, and D S Willis, and T K Pitcairn
Moray House School of Education, Edinburgh, UK. j.wishart@ed.ac.uk

BACKGROUND Interpreting emotional expressions is a socio-cognitive skill central to interpersonal interaction. Poor emotion recognition has been reported in autism but is less well understood in other kinds of intellectual disabilities (ID), with procedural differences making comparisons across studies and syndromes difficult. This study aimed to compare directly facial emotion recognition skills in children with fragile X syndrome (FXS), Down's syndrome (DS) and non-specific intellectual disability (NSID), contrasting ability and error profiles with those of typically developing (TD) children of equivalent cognitive and linguistic status. METHODS Sixty children participated in the study: 15 FXS, 15 DS, 15 NSID and 15 TD children. Standardised measures of cognitive, language and socialisation skills were collected for all children, along with measures of performance on two photo-matching tasks: an 'identity-matching' task (to control for basic face-processing ability) and an 'emotion-matching' task (happiness, sadness, anger, surprise, fear or disgust). RESULTS Identity-matching ability did not differ across the four child groups. Only the DS group performed significantly more poorly on the emotion-matching task and only in comparison to the TD group, with fear recognition an area of particular difficulty. CONCLUSIONS Findings support previous evidence of emotion recognition abilities commensurate with overall developmental level in children with FXS or NSID, but not DS. They also suggest, however, that syndrome-specific difficulties may be subtle and detectable, at least in smaller-scale studies, only in comparison with TD matches, and not always across syndromes. Implications for behavioural phenotype theory, educational interventions and future research are discussed.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008607 Intellectual Disability Subnormal intellectual functioning which originates during the developmental period. This has multiple potential etiologies, including genetic defects and perinatal insults. Intelligence quotient (IQ) scores are commonly used to determine whether an individual has an intellectual disability. IQ scores between 70 and 79 are in the borderline range. Scores below 67 are in the disabled range. (from Joynt, Clinical Neurology, 1992, Ch55, p28) Disability, Intellectual,Idiocy,Mental Retardation,Retardation, Mental,Deficiency, Mental,Intellectual Development Disorder,Mental Deficiency,Mental Retardation, Psychosocial,Deficiencies, Mental,Development Disorder, Intellectual,Development Disorders, Intellectual,Disabilities, Intellectual,Disorder, Intellectual Development,Disorders, Intellectual Development,Intellectual Development Disorders,Intellectual Disabilities,Mental Deficiencies,Mental Retardations, Psychosocial,Psychosocial Mental Retardation,Psychosocial Mental Retardations,Retardation, Psychosocial Mental,Retardations, Psychosocial Mental
D002648 Child A person 6 to 12 years of age. An individual 2 to 5 years old is CHILD, PRESCHOOL. Children
D002675 Child, Preschool A child between the ages of 2 and 5. Children, Preschool,Preschool Child,Preschool Children
D005149 Facial Expression Observable changes of expression in the face in response to emotional stimuli. Face Expression,Expression, Face,Expression, Facial,Face Expressions,Facial Expressions
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000339 Affect The feeling-tone accompaniment of an idea or mental representation. It is the most direct psychic derivative of instinct and the psychic representative of the various bodily changes by means of which instincts manifest themselves. Mood,Affects,Moods
D012938 Social Perception The perceiving of attributes, characteristics, and behaviors of one's associates or social groups. Perception, Social,Perceptions, Social,Social Perceptions

Related Publications

J G Wishart, and K R Cebula, and D S Willis, and T K Pitcairn
September 2008, Current opinion in psychiatry,
J G Wishart, and K R Cebula, and D S Willis, and T K Pitcairn
March 1991, Journal of learning disabilities,
J G Wishart, and K R Cebula, and D S Willis, and T K Pitcairn
January 2010, Journal of learning disabilities,
J G Wishart, and K R Cebula, and D S Willis, and T K Pitcairn
January 2016, Research in developmental disabilities,
J G Wishart, and K R Cebula, and D S Willis, and T K Pitcairn
January 2008, Research in developmental disabilities,
J G Wishart, and K R Cebula, and D S Willis, and T K Pitcairn
January 2006, Autism : the international journal of research and practice,
J G Wishart, and K R Cebula, and D S Willis, and T K Pitcairn
October 2006, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR,
J G Wishart, and K R Cebula, and D S Willis, and T K Pitcairn
October 2004, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR,
J G Wishart, and K R Cebula, and D S Willis, and T K Pitcairn
April 1998, Behavior modification,
J G Wishart, and K R Cebula, and D S Willis, and T K Pitcairn
January 2007, Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews,
Copied contents to your clipboard!