Previous experimental evidence has been interpreted as support for regulation of both acoustics and aerodynamics during speech production. One recent perspective is that although speech acoustics may be manipulated, regulation of aerodynamics is a central component of the processes that produce speech. From this perspective, it has been suggested that aerodynamic regulation is given priority over perceptual accuracy. The experiment attempted to test this hypothesis by forcing speakers into a choice between aerodynamic and acoustic regulation. The intensity level of frication (embedded in a carrier phrase) was selectively amplified or attenuated and fed back to the speaker on line. Intraoral air pressure was recorded in order to assess whether or not perturbed auditory feedback would result in aerodynamic compensation. Although compensatory changes in peak intraoral air pressure, pressure duration, and pressure curve area were seen in response to 30-dB alterations of frication, no systematic effects were seen for smaller auditory manipulations. Further, the compensations were less than what one might expect from a system controlling auditory output. Explanations of these findings and their implications for the control of speech production are offered.