Robust SNP genotyping by multiplex PCR and arrayed primer extension. 2008

Mohua Podder, and Jian Ruan, and Ben W Tripp, and Zane E Chu, and Scott J Tebbutt
The James Hogg iCAPTURE Centre for Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research, St, Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada. mpodder@mrl.ubc.ca

BACKGROUND Arrayed primer extension (APEX) is a microarray-based rapid minisequencing methodology that may have utility in 'personalized medicine' applications that involve genetic diagnostics of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). However, to date there have been few reports that objectively evaluate the assay completion rate, call rate and accuracy of APEX. We have further developed robust assay design, chemistry and analysis methodologies, and have sought to determine how effective APEX is in comparison to leading 'gold-standard' genotyping platforms. Our methods have been tested against industry-leading technologies in two blinded experiments based on Coriell DNA samples and SNP genotype data from the International HapMap Project. RESULTS In the first experiment, we genotyped 50 SNPs across the entire 270 HapMap Coriell DNA sample set. For each Coriell sample, DNA template was amplified in a total of 7 multiplex PCRs prior to genotyping. We obtained good results for 41 of the SNPs, with 99.8% genotype concordance with HapMap data, at an automated call rate of 94.9% (not including the 9 failed SNPs). In the second experiment, involving modifications to the initial DNA amplification so that a single 50-plex PCR could be achieved, genotyping of the same 50 SNPs across each of 49 randomly chosen Coriell DNA samples allowed extremely robust 50-plex genotyping from as little as 5 ng of DNA, with 100% assay completion rate, 100% call rate and >99.9% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS We have shown our methods to be effective for robust multiplex SNP genotyping using APEX, with 100% call rate and >99.9% accuracy. We believe that such methodology may be useful in future point-of-care clinical diagnostic applications where accuracy and call rate are both paramount.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Mohua Podder, and Jian Ruan, and Ben W Tripp, and Zane E Chu, and Scott J Tebbutt
January 2009, Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.),
Mohua Podder, and Jian Ruan, and Ben W Tripp, and Zane E Chu, and Scott J Tebbutt
January 2007, Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.),
Mohua Podder, and Jian Ruan, and Ben W Tripp, and Zane E Chu, and Scott J Tebbutt
December 2004, Bioinformatics (Oxford, England),
Mohua Podder, and Jian Ruan, and Ben W Tripp, and Zane E Chu, and Scott J Tebbutt
July 2005, Clinical chemistry,
Mohua Podder, and Jian Ruan, and Ben W Tripp, and Zane E Chu, and Scott J Tebbutt
January 2008, Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.),
Mohua Podder, and Jian Ruan, and Ben W Tripp, and Zane E Chu, and Scott J Tebbutt
January 2007, Genetic testing,
Mohua Podder, and Jian Ruan, and Ben W Tripp, and Zane E Chu, and Scott J Tebbutt
February 2000, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine,
Mohua Podder, and Jian Ruan, and Ben W Tripp, and Zane E Chu, and Scott J Tebbutt
December 2001, BioTechniques,
Mohua Podder, and Jian Ruan, and Ben W Tripp, and Zane E Chu, and Scott J Tebbutt
January 2008, Annals of clinical and laboratory science,
Mohua Podder, and Jian Ruan, and Ben W Tripp, and Zane E Chu, and Scott J Tebbutt
November 2020, Molecular biology reports,
Copied contents to your clipboard!