Imaging characteristics of DHOG, a hepatobiliary contrast agent for preclinical microCT in mice. 2008

Tobias Henning, and Axel W Weber, and Jan S Bauer, and Reinhard Meier, and Janette M Carlsen, and Elizabeth J Sutton, and Sven Prevrhal, and Sibylle I Ziegler, and Hubertus Feussner, and Heike E Daldrup-Link, and Ernst J Rummeny
University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry St., Suite # 350, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA. tobias.henning@radiology.ucsf.edu

OBJECTIVE This study was performed to assess the imaging characteristics and pharmacokinetics of 1,3-Bis-[7-(3-amino-2,4,6-triiodophenyl)-heptanoyl]-2-oleoyl glycerol (DHOG, Fenestra LC), a hepatobiliary contrast agent for microCT. METHODS We investigated the abdomen of 18 female C3H mice in a MicroCAT II microCT scanner before contrast agent injection and at multiple time points up to 48 hours after intravenous injection of DHOG (1 g I/kg body weight). The contrast agent effect was determined quantitatively and dynamically by measuring pre- and postcontrast Hounsfield units (HU) of the liver, aorta, spleen, and kidneys. Based on additional phantom measurements, the reproducibility of lesion detection was estimated for different lesion sizes. RESULTS DHOG caused a marked early postcontrast enhancement of blood in the aorta and a very high enhancement of the spleen, both slowly declined after 90 minutes. The liver parenchyma showed a slow contrast agent accumulation and clearly increased HU data between 3 and 7 hours after injection. No significant renal parenchymal enhancement or excretion was noticed. At early time points after administration, DHOG exhibits characteristics of a macromolecular contrast agent by demonstrating a blood pool effect. At later time points, DHOG provides a prolonged, marked liver enhancement on microCT images due to its specific liver uptake. For a lesion size of 1 mm diameter, the variability in between two scans was 27.7 HU (P < .05) and the variability for different planes of one scan was 19.8 HU (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS DHOG yields a very good visualization of the liver and delineation of the surrounding structures with a long plateau. It is a very suitable contrast agent for liver imaging in mice for microCT imaging. The presented protocol provides a high reproducibility for lesion detection with a relatively low radiation dose.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007275 Injections, Intravenous Injections made into a vein for therapeutic or experimental purposes. Intravenous Injections,Injection, Intravenous,Intravenous Injection
D007456 Iodine Isotopes Stable iodine atoms that have the same atomic number as the element iodine, but differ in atomic weight. I-127 is the only naturally occurring stable iodine isotope. Isotopes, Iodine
D007668 Kidney Body organ that filters blood for the secretion of URINE and that regulates ion concentrations. Kidneys
D008099 Liver A large lobed glandular organ in the abdomen of vertebrates that is responsible for detoxification, metabolism, synthesis and storage of various substances. Livers
D008107 Liver Diseases Pathological processes of the LIVER. Liver Dysfunction,Disease, Liver,Diseases, Liver,Dysfunction, Liver,Dysfunctions, Liver,Liver Disease,Liver Dysfunctions
D008809 Mice, Inbred C3H An inbred strain of mouse that is used as a general purpose strain in a wide variety of RESEARCH areas including CANCER; INFECTIOUS DISEASES; sensorineural, and cardiovascular biology research. Mice, C3H,Mouse, C3H,Mouse, Inbred C3H,C3H Mice,C3H Mice, Inbred,C3H Mouse,C3H Mouse, Inbred,Inbred C3H Mice,Inbred C3H Mouse
D011829 Radiation Dosage The amount of radiation energy that is deposited in a unit mass of material, such as tissues of plants or animal. In RADIOTHERAPY, radiation dosage is expressed in gray units (Gy). In RADIOLOGIC HEALTH, the dosage is expressed by the product of absorbed dose (Gy) and quality factor (a function of linear energy transfer), and is called radiation dose equivalent in sievert units (Sv). Sievert Units,Dosage, Radiation,Gray Units,Gy Radiation,Sv Radiation Dose Equivalent,Dosages, Radiation,Radiation Dosages,Units, Gray,Units, Sievert
D011856 Radiographic Image Enhancement Improvement in the quality of an x-ray image by use of an intensifying screen, tube, or filter and by optimum exposure techniques. Digital processing methods are often employed. Digital Radiography,Image Enhancement, Radiographic,Radiography, Digital,Enhancement, Radiographic Image,Enhancements, Radiographic Image,Image Enhancements, Radiographic,Radiographic Image Enhancements
D002758 Cholangiography An imaging test of the BILIARY TRACT in which a contrast dye (RADIOPAQUE MEDIA) is injected into the BILE DUCT and x-ray pictures are taken. Cholangiographies
D003287 Contrast Media Substances used to allow enhanced visualization of tissues. Radiopaque Media,Contrast Agent,Contrast Agents,Contrast Material,Contrast Materials,Radiocontrast Agent,Radiocontrast Agents,Radiocontrast Media,Agent, Contrast,Agent, Radiocontrast,Agents, Contrast,Agents, Radiocontrast,Material, Contrast,Materials, Contrast,Media, Contrast,Media, Radiocontrast,Media, Radiopaque

Related Publications

Tobias Henning, and Axel W Weber, and Jan S Bauer, and Reinhard Meier, and Janette M Carlsen, and Elizabeth J Sutton, and Sven Prevrhal, and Sibylle I Ziegler, and Hubertus Feussner, and Heike E Daldrup-Link, and Ernst J Rummeny
January 1991, Radiology,
Tobias Henning, and Axel W Weber, and Jan S Bauer, and Reinhard Meier, and Janette M Carlsen, and Elizabeth J Sutton, and Sven Prevrhal, and Sibylle I Ziegler, and Hubertus Feussner, and Heike E Daldrup-Link, and Ernst J Rummeny
February 1997, The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences,
Tobias Henning, and Axel W Weber, and Jan S Bauer, and Reinhard Meier, and Janette M Carlsen, and Elizabeth J Sutton, and Sven Prevrhal, and Sibylle I Ziegler, and Hubertus Feussner, and Heike E Daldrup-Link, and Ernst J Rummeny
April 1992, Radiology,
Tobias Henning, and Axel W Weber, and Jan S Bauer, and Reinhard Meier, and Janette M Carlsen, and Elizabeth J Sutton, and Sven Prevrhal, and Sibylle I Ziegler, and Hubertus Feussner, and Heike E Daldrup-Link, and Ernst J Rummeny
October 1993, Investigative radiology,
Tobias Henning, and Axel W Weber, and Jan S Bauer, and Reinhard Meier, and Janette M Carlsen, and Elizabeth J Sutton, and Sven Prevrhal, and Sibylle I Ziegler, and Hubertus Feussner, and Heike E Daldrup-Link, and Ernst J Rummeny
February 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
Tobias Henning, and Axel W Weber, and Jan S Bauer, and Reinhard Meier, and Janette M Carlsen, and Elizabeth J Sutton, and Sven Prevrhal, and Sibylle I Ziegler, and Hubertus Feussner, and Heike E Daldrup-Link, and Ernst J Rummeny
February 2006, Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987),
Tobias Henning, and Axel W Weber, and Jan S Bauer, and Reinhard Meier, and Janette M Carlsen, and Elizabeth J Sutton, and Sven Prevrhal, and Sibylle I Ziegler, and Hubertus Feussner, and Heike E Daldrup-Link, and Ernst J Rummeny
January 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography,
Tobias Henning, and Axel W Weber, and Jan S Bauer, and Reinhard Meier, and Janette M Carlsen, and Elizabeth J Sutton, and Sven Prevrhal, and Sibylle I Ziegler, and Hubertus Feussner, and Heike E Daldrup-Link, and Ernst J Rummeny
May 2002, Academic radiology,
Tobias Henning, and Axel W Weber, and Jan S Bauer, and Reinhard Meier, and Janette M Carlsen, and Elizabeth J Sutton, and Sven Prevrhal, and Sibylle I Ziegler, and Hubertus Feussner, and Heike E Daldrup-Link, and Ernst J Rummeny
September 1988, Investigative radiology,
Tobias Henning, and Axel W Weber, and Jan S Bauer, and Reinhard Meier, and Janette M Carlsen, and Elizabeth J Sutton, and Sven Prevrhal, and Sibylle I Ziegler, and Hubertus Feussner, and Heike E Daldrup-Link, and Ernst J Rummeny
November 1985, Radiology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!