Evaluation of 3-Day Course of Doxycycline for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis Cervicitis. 1997

M B Reedy, and P J Sulak, and S L Miller, and M Ortiz, and C Kasberg-Preece, and T J Kuehl
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Scott & White Clinic 1600 University Drive East College Station TX 77840 USA.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a 3-day course of doxycycline to a standard 7-day course for treating uncomplicated chlamydia cervicitis. METHODS During an 18-month period, 77 women with uncomplicated chlamydia cervicitis were randomized to receive either a 3-day or a 7-day course of doxycycline (100 mg twice daily). Tests of cure were performed 3 weeks after completion of therapy with the Amplicor polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, NJ). Demographics, therapeutic results, and side effects for the two groups were compared. RESULTS Seventy-three patients completed the study: 35 in the 3-day group and 38 in the 7-day group. There were no significant differences in age, gravidity, or parity between the groups. There was a 94% (33/35) cure rate in the 3-day group and a 95% (36/38) cure rate in the 7-day group (P = 1.0). Thirty-four percent and 32% of the patients in the 3- and 7-day groups reported side effects, respectively; there was no significant differences between the 3- and 7-day groups in regard to population demographics, patient compliance, therapeutic outcome, or side effects. CONCLUSIONS A 3-day course of doxycycline appears to be as effective as a 7-day course of doxycycline for the treatment of uncomplicated chlamydia cervicitis.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

M B Reedy, and P J Sulak, and S L Miller, and M Ortiz, and C Kasberg-Preece, and T J Kuehl
January 1986, Clinical therapeutics,
M B Reedy, and P J Sulak, and S L Miller, and M Ortiz, and C Kasberg-Preece, and T J Kuehl
April 1993, Revista clinica espanola,
M B Reedy, and P J Sulak, and S L Miller, and M Ortiz, and C Kasberg-Preece, and T J Kuehl
March 1986, Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique,
M B Reedy, and P J Sulak, and S L Miller, and M Ortiz, and C Kasberg-Preece, and T J Kuehl
September 1984, Ginecologia y obstetricia de Mexico,
M B Reedy, and P J Sulak, and S L Miller, and M Ortiz, and C Kasberg-Preece, and T J Kuehl
January 1995, The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice,
M B Reedy, and P J Sulak, and S L Miller, and M Ortiz, and C Kasberg-Preece, and T J Kuehl
July 1989, Journal of chemotherapy (Florence, Italy),
M B Reedy, and P J Sulak, and S L Miller, and M Ortiz, and C Kasberg-Preece, and T J Kuehl
September 1986, The Medical journal of Australia,
M B Reedy, and P J Sulak, and S L Miller, and M Ortiz, and C Kasberg-Preece, and T J Kuehl
November 1985, The Japanese journal of antibiotics,
M B Reedy, and P J Sulak, and S L Miller, and M Ortiz, and C Kasberg-Preece, and T J Kuehl
January 1982, Przeglad dermatologiczny,
M B Reedy, and P J Sulak, and S L Miller, and M Ortiz, and C Kasberg-Preece, and T J Kuehl
December 1978, Obstetrics and gynecology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!