Furan is found in various food items and is cytotoxic and carcinogenic in the liver of rats and mice. Metabolism of furan includes the formation of an unsaturated dialdehyde, cis-2-butene-1,4-dial (BDA). In view of the multifunctional electrophilic reactivity of BDA, adduct formation with protein and DNA may explain some of the toxic effects. Short-term tests for genotoxicity of furan in mammalian cells are inconclusive, little is known for BDA. We investigated BDA generated by hydrolysis of 2,5-diacetoxy-2,5-dihydrofuran for genotoxicity in L5178Y tk+/- mouse lymphoma cells using standard procedures for the comet assay, the micronucleus test, and the mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase gene mutation assay, using 4-h incubation periods. Cytotoxicity was remarkable: cell viability at concentrations>or=50 microM was reduced to <50%. In the dose range up to 25 microM, viability was >90%. Measures of comet-tail length and thymidine-kinase mutant frequency were increased 1.6- and 2.4-fold above control, respectively. Analysis of three fully independent replicates with a linear mixed-effects model showed a highly significant increase with concentration for both endpoints. Compared to methyl methanesulfonate used as a positive control, BDA was of similar potency with respect to genotoxicity, but it was much more cytotoxic. Furan added to cell cultures at doses that resulted in time-averaged effective concentrations of up to 3100 microM was neither cytotoxic nor genotoxic. A potential cross-linking activity of BDA was investigated by checking whether gamma radiation-induced DNA migration in the comet assay could be reduced by pre-treatment with BDA. In contrast to the effect of the positive control glutaraldehyde, BDA treatment did not reduce the comet tail length. On the contrary, an increase was observed at >or=100 microM BDA, which was attributable to early apoptotic cells. Although BDA was found to be a relatively potent genotoxic agent in terms of the concentration necessary to double the background measures, cytotoxicity strongly limited the concentration range that produced interpretable results. This may explain some of the inconclusive results and indicates that non-genotoxic effects must be taken into account in the discussion of the modes of toxic and carcinogenic action of furan.