Effect of mismatches for major histocompatibility complex and minor antigens on corneal graft rejection. 1991

S M Nicholls, and B B Bradley, and D L Easty
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medical Sciences, Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.

The importance of minor histocompatibility genes in corneal graft rejection was investigated using a model that simulates the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and minor mismatches of the human allograft more accurately than previous animal models. DA(RT1a) x LEW(RT1(1]F1 hybrid rats were backcrossed to LEW, and the backcross generation were used as corneal graft recipients. Female DA(RT1a) strain animals were used as donors throughout. As in humans, the MHC disparity (a to 1) between each donor-recipient pair could be controlled; minor mismatches were variable and unknown. The MHC haplotype of each backcross individual (either homozygous l/l) or heterozygous a/l) was determined. Depending on this haplotype, the transplanted DA cornea was either matched or mismatched with the recipient for MHC antigens. The average proportion of minor disparate loci was 50%, although this was variable and unknown from recipient to recipient. Some animals of each MHC type were sensitized with three subcutaneous DA strain skin grafts at intervals of 2 weeks. Prior sensitization caused more rapid corneal graft rejection in both MHC mismatched (P less than 0.001) and matched (P less than 0.01) animals. All animals in the two MHC-mismatched groups (sensitized, 26; unsensitized, 17) and most in the MHC-matched groups (sensitized, 25 of 27; unsensitized, all 13) rejected their grafts. The MHC matching resulted in a greater range of survival times, although the difference in survival in unsensitized animals between matched and mismatched groups was not significant (unsensitized, P greater than 0.05; sensitized, P less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007114 Immunization Deliberate stimulation of the host's immune response. ACTIVE IMMUNIZATION involves administration of ANTIGENS or IMMUNOLOGIC ADJUVANTS. PASSIVE IMMUNIZATION involves administration of IMMUNE SERA or LYMPHOCYTES or their extracts (e.g., transfer factor, immune RNA) or transplantation of immunocompetent cell producing tissue (thymus or bone marrow). Immunologic Stimulation,Immunostimulation,Sensitization, Immunologic,Variolation,Immunologic Sensitization,Immunological Stimulation,Sensitization, Immunological,Stimulation, Immunologic,Immunizations,Immunological Sensitization,Immunological Sensitizations,Immunological Stimulations,Sensitizations, Immunological,Stimulation, Immunological,Stimulations, Immunological,Variolations
D008285 Major Histocompatibility Complex The genetic region which contains the loci of genes which determine the structure of the serologically defined (SD) and lymphocyte-defined (LD) TRANSPLANTATION ANTIGENS, genes which control the structure of the IMMUNE RESPONSE-ASSOCIATED ANTIGENS, HUMAN; the IMMUNE RESPONSE GENES which control the ability of an animal to respond immunologically to antigenic stimuli, and genes which determine the structure and/or level of the first four components of complement. Histocompatibility Complex,Complex, Histocompatibility,Complex, Major Histocompatibility,Complices, Histocompatibility,Complices, Major Histocompatibility,Histocompatibility Complex, Major,Histocompatibility Complices,Histocompatibility Complices, Major,Major Histocompatibility Complices
D008297 Male Males
D008912 Minor Histocompatibility Loci Genetic loci responsible for the encoding of histocompatibility antigens other than those encoded by the MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX. The antigens encoded by these genes are often responsible for graft rejection in cases where histocompatibility has been established by standard tests. The location of some of these loci on the X and Y chromosomes explains why grafts from males to females may be rejected while grafts from females to males are accepted. In the mouse roughly 30 minor histocompatibility loci have been recognized, comprising more than 500 genes. Histocompatibility Loci, Minor,Histocompatibility Locus, Minor,Loci, Minor Histocompatibility,Locus, Minor Histocompatibility,Minor Histocompatibility Locus
D011922 Rats, Mutant Strains Rats bearing mutant genes which are phenotypically expressed in the animals. Mutant Strains Rat,Mutant Strains Rats,Rat, Mutant Strains,Strains Rat, Mutant,Strains Rats, Mutant
D004195 Disease Models, Animal Naturally-occurring or experimentally-induced animal diseases with pathological processes analogous to human diseases. Animal Disease Model,Animal Disease Models,Disease Model, Animal
D005260 Female Females
D006084 Graft Rejection An immune response with both cellular and humoral components, directed against an allogeneic transplant, whose tissue antigens are not compatible with those of the recipient. Transplant Rejection,Rejection, Transplant,Transplantation Rejection,Graft Rejections,Rejection, Graft,Rejection, Transplantation,Rejections, Graft,Rejections, Transplant,Rejections, Transplantation,Transplant Rejections,Transplantation Rejections
D006239 Haplotypes The genetic constitution of individuals with respect to one member of a pair of allelic genes, or sets of genes that are closely linked and tend to be inherited together such as those of the MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX. Haplotype
D006650 Histocompatibility Testing Identification of the major histocompatibility antigens of transplant DONORS and potential recipients, usually by serological tests. Donor and recipient pairs should be of identical ABO blood group, and in addition should be matched as closely as possible for HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGENS in order to minimize the likelihood of allograft rejection. (King, Dictionary of Genetics, 4th ed) Crossmatching, Tissue,HLA Typing,Tissue Typing,Crossmatchings, Tissue,HLA Typings,Histocompatibility Testings,Testing, Histocompatibility,Testings, Histocompatibility,Tissue Crossmatching,Tissue Crossmatchings,Tissue Typings,Typing, HLA,Typing, Tissue,Typings, HLA,Typings, Tissue

Related Publications

S M Nicholls, and B B Bradley, and D L Easty
February 1993, Transplantation proceedings,
S M Nicholls, and B B Bradley, and D L Easty
February 1993, Transplantation proceedings,
S M Nicholls, and B B Bradley, and D L Easty
February 2017, Blood,
S M Nicholls, and B B Bradley, and D L Easty
January 1983, Survey of ophthalmology,
S M Nicholls, and B B Bradley, and D L Easty
May 1985, Transplantation,
S M Nicholls, and B B Bradley, and D L Easty
October 1983, Transplantation,
S M Nicholls, and B B Bradley, and D L Easty
May 1978, Poultry science,
S M Nicholls, and B B Bradley, and D L Easty
January 1982, Immunogenetics,
S M Nicholls, and B B Bradley, and D L Easty
April 1981, Transplantation,
Copied contents to your clipboard!