Phytate and phytase: consequences for protein utilisation. 2000

P H Selle, and V Ravindran, and A Caldwell, and W L Bryden
BASF Animal Nutrition, 87a St Hilliers Road, Auburn, NSW 2144, Australia.

The excretion of large amounts of P in effluent from intensive pig and poultry units is indicative of the poor availability of phytate-bound P in plant-derived feed ingredients. This environmental problem prompted the development and acceptance of microbial phytase feed enzymes for single-stomached animals. Their introduction led to an increasing recognition that phytate may have adverse effects on protein utilisation in addition to P. Consequently, the nutritional relevance of protein-phytate interactions for pigs and poultry is considered in the present review. Since the current understanding of the effects of protein-phytate interactions comes mainly from responses obtained to added phytase, literature on the influence of microbial phytases on amino acid digestibility and utilisation is summarised, followed by a discussion of possible mechanisms contributing to the negative effects of phytate. However, the rationale for the protein responses to added phytase remains largely speculative, and several modes of action are probably involved. It may be that the release of protein from protein-phytate complexes occurring naturally in feed ingredients, the prevention of formation of binary and ternary protein-phytate complexes within the gut, the alleviation of the negative impact of phytate on digestive enzymes and the reduction in endogenous amino acid losses are all contributing factors. A better understanding of the mechanisms of protein-phytate interactions and the modes of action of exogenous phytase enzymes is clearly desirable. Studies are also needed to identify and quantify the factors that contribute to the variable amino acid responses to added phytase. It appears that the relative solubilities of phytate salts and proteins from different feed ingredients and their effects on the extent of protein-phytate complex formation, coupled with variations in the effectiveness of phytase in different dietary contexts, may be the major factors responsible.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

P H Selle, and V Ravindran, and A Caldwell, and W L Bryden
March 2006, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry,
P H Selle, and V Ravindran, and A Caldwell, and W L Bryden
June 2022, British poultry science,
P H Selle, and V Ravindran, and A Caldwell, and W L Bryden
June 2012, Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition,
P H Selle, and V Ravindran, and A Caldwell, and W L Bryden
May 1989, Nutrition reviews,
P H Selle, and V Ravindran, and A Caldwell, and W L Bryden
October 1999, Applied and environmental microbiology,
P H Selle, and V Ravindran, and A Caldwell, and W L Bryden
January 2023, Frontiers in microbiology,
P H Selle, and V Ravindran, and A Caldwell, and W L Bryden
October 2000, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry,
P H Selle, and V Ravindran, and A Caldwell, and W L Bryden
December 1993, Zeitschrift fur Ernahrungswissenschaft,
P H Selle, and V Ravindran, and A Caldwell, and W L Bryden
November 2004, Structure (London, England : 1993),
P H Selle, and V Ravindran, and A Caldwell, and W L Bryden
March 2024, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience,
Copied contents to your clipboard!